Tell me more ×
Programmers Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional programmers interested in conceptual questions about software development. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Cassandra & HBase both do not efficiently support storage of blobs like images. Storing directly on HDFS stresses the Namenode because of huge number of files. Facebook uses Haystack for images and attachments storage, but this is not open source. So is Lustre a good choice for distributed blob storage? I have read that Amazon S3 is used by many, but this would cost money and personally, I would not like to rely on third party system. What are other suggestions?

share|improve this question

3 Answers

How about Coda or GlusterFS? Those are scalable distributed file systems and open source.

share|improve this answer

GlusterFS can work fine because it can work on very cheap hardware, but it's hard to tune. I have my own concerns about performance, but I'll expect to have on cluster working in the following months to watch how it works but myself.

share|improve this answer

GitHub uses Riak to store GitHub Pages documents. It would probably be a good fit for other blob storage uses as well.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.