Programmers Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional programmers interested in conceptual questions about software development. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am working on a very small project and my design would be using technologies such as JSP, servlets, and POJOs.

I'm considering a workflow where a JSP page will receive input data, then submit it to a servlet. The servlet would then have a lot of helper POJOs in it that would do all the real work.

One thing I've noticed with this approach very early on is that it grew into a huge number of if-then-else statements.

Is there a better way to accomplish what I'm trying to do without having to resort to a framework?

share|improve this question
Hi simon, I've tried to clean up your question and match your title to what you're asking, but please feel free to improve the title if the spirit of what you're looking for has been lost. – user8 Dec 19 '11 at 9:42
Can you give and example of the if then else statements? It does sound like you're trying to write this in a MVC pattern, which is a good thing, but there are some frameworks that have already codified this pattern for you. – Martijn Verburg Dec 19 '11 at 10:52
@MarkTrapp hi, thanks for editing the question :D – niccolo m. Dec 19 '11 at 12:12
@MartijnVerburg hi, for example I got 4 jsp pages named as Create, Retrieve, Update and Delete. When one form/page submits, my doPost method would look like if (action.equals("create")) { // stuff } else if (action.equals("retrieve")) { // stuff } ... and the if then else continues to satisfy all the form submits – niccolo m. Dec 19 '11 at 12:14
up vote 1 down vote accepted

JSP pages are served by a servlet, so your sentence "a JSP page will receive input data, then submit it to a servlet" sounds to me like a strange approach (perhaps I didn't understand it well). Normally, you first see your data in the "servlet", then render a document (i.e. JSP) that is sent to client browser.

If you don't want to use a web framework, you'll end up writing lots of common stuff yourself (parsing parameters, converting them from strings to the needed types, validating them, make the results available to your JSP...), and yes, that needs a lot of if/then/else.

In very general terms, what you want to do is to use a single servlet that services your requests:

 public void doGet(HttpServletRequest req, HttpServletResponse res)
                               throws ServletException, IOException {

    // Parse the request and select an aproppriate POJO that services this action
    // Your service POJOS should have a common interface (i.e. validate(),
    // service()...)

    // Call a binding method that reads parameters from GET/POST and maps them
    // to properties of your POJO

    // Call the POJO "validate()" so you know that input is ok

    // Call the POJO "service()" so it runs the appropriate process:
    // This should return all needed data and the name of the "JSP" you will use

    // Generate and send JSP to client


But actually, you need much more flexibility: you need to be able to use redirects from your action, you'll need to handle exceptions in a reasonable way, you'd need to consider content encoding... in short, I strongly suggest you to reconsider using a framework (Struts 2, Spring MVC, Tapestry.... there are so many), or alternatively post the code that services one of your requests so people can suggest improvements.

I hope it helps.

share|improve this answer
hi, you explained it well. It is just that we are in a tight situation (the deadline is the DEADLINE) and there is not enough time to learn a new framework but you really refreshed my mind why a framework is to be used. I think I might reconsider this thing with my boss. thanks, appreciate the help :D – niccolo m. Dec 19 '11 at 12:23
just a suggestion, but if you are in a rush for something simple, setting up Spring MVC is a breeze and will do so much for you... – jjmontes Dec 19 '11 at 12:34
nice.. will surely keep that suggestion in mind for work tomorrow :D thanks again – niccolo m. Dec 19 '11 at 15:35
Don't forget that the common code you've already written and are familiar with can be pulled out into a commons library. Instant framework. – Dalin Seivewright Dec 19 '11 at 18:49
yes, I think it is time to put my name all over the code I have written. :D Thanks for the suggestion – niccolo m. Dec 20 '11 at 0:19

I would try to shape the application developing a DSL (domain specific language).

That would leverage the protocol logic, decupling from the actual input, and via reflection should allows execution (instance of POJO) of the required duties. The protocol grammar could be developed and tested stand alone and incrementally, with the help of a parser generator.

Of course, if you're akin to 'syntax love'.

The answer from @jjmontes is of course somewhat more practical.

share|improve this answer
hey, thanks for the answer. I believe I have read some documents about this programming principle but with the use of groovy only. This is kinda out of the question but can you give me some links that can make me understand more about this DSL? thanks :D – niccolo m. Dec 19 '11 at 12:29
Hi Simon. I didn't realized your deadline was so strict. My suggestion it's a bit too much generic. Anyway, here [1] a link (rather generic, doesn't show code, just jargon). This other [2] it's more practical, doesn't require any parser generator, just methodology. [1] [2]… – CapelliC Dec 19 '11 at 23:06
thanks for all the help @chac ! appreciate it :D – niccolo m. Dec 20 '11 at 0:33

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.