I'm writing an essay, and would like to have some empiric evidence, perhaps longitudinal data where the popularity of these technologies is compared over a period of some years.
Are there any statistics that show the popularity of Git versus SVN?
|
|
To add to Jan's answer, Ohloh has been crawled (only) three times by the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine, but July 2011 is unreadable, so that gives three data sets including today (plus future edits): August 2010
May 2011
February 2012
June 2012
This appears to show that, of the open source repositories registered on Ohloh, there's been a huge growth in both Git and Subversion. But whereas they were about level in 2010, there's now double the number of Subversion repositories (...indexed by Ohloh). However, August 2010 has separate values for Subversion (25,336) and SvnSync (117,326). Later dates don't include SvnSync (a Subversion read-only mirroring tool), so it's fair to surmise the later Subversion figures also include the large SvnSync share, which may skew your conclusions. |
||||
|
|
|
Sites such as Ohloh and Github only give you an indication of what's going on in the open source world, and take no account of the (much larger) commercial/industrial/closed source side of things; Google Trends gives all sorts of other hits for "subversion" and "git" (both of which have other meanings outside the SCM world). The best indicator you're likely to get at the moment is the Eclipse Community Survey. This is conducted every year by the Eclipse Foundation and since Eclipse users tend to be Java developers of all shapes and sizes, it targets a fairly representative cross-section of the software development community as a whole. The only problem is that Windows developers are probably under-represented, but nevertheless, it still gives a reasonable guide as to where things are at, and since it's been going for a few years now, you can start to see what trends are beginning to emerge. Their figures for Git are:
For Subversion:
The 2012 survey report is due out in the next couple of weeks. In the meantime, another data point we can consider is the growth of Github. Back in August, I observed that it had just under a million users, though I didn't record the exact figure. This has grown to 1,654,419 users as of the time of writing: an increase of at least 66% in 288 days, or about 90% a year. If we assume that the growth of Github is indicative of the rate of increase of Git usage industry-wide (a potentially dubious assumption: see comments below), that would suggest that Git adoption is currently somewhere between 20% and 25% industry-wide, and on course to overtake Subversion to the number 1 slot sometime in the next 12-18 months or so. Update: the results of the 2012 Eclipse Community Survey give Git/Github a total market share of 27.6%. This is much more than I was expecting (I thought it would be low 20s at best) and means that it now almost certainly has significant penetration into corporate and enterprise environments. Subversion is still in the number 1 slot for now, but given these figures, I would be very surprised indeed if this remains the case this time next year. Sources:
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
Further to my previous answer, there are some websites out there that track demand for skills among employers. These are a useful metric because they show exactly where things are at in corporate/enterprise settings, while disregarding the open source/hobbyist market (which can be pretty fanboyish at the best of times). One example is http://www.itjobswatch.co.uk/. Their statistics are as follows as of yesterday:
(The percentages above are percentages of only those jobs that list a specific source control tool. I wasn't able to find statistics for any other system e.g. Bazaar, CVS, SourceGear Vault etc.) It appears that demand for Git has approximately doubled in the past year, establishing it firmly as one of the Big Three, but their trends also seem to indicate that its growth may have slowed significantly in the past six months or so, so it's not clear how things are likely to proceed from here. Subversion seems to be holding onto its market share despite Git's increasing popularity and TFS is also growing steadily. |
|||
|
|
|
I think ohloh has some relevance, but I am not sure you could pry historical data from them. Also for some specific domain, see use of vcs for Debian packagin (you could be able to pry some historical data from UDD, but probably not very long, as the Vcs-* fields are not that old). |
|||
|
|