Take the 2-minute tour ×
Programmers Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional programmers interested in conceptual questions about software development. It's 100% free, no registration required.

What is the decisive difference between LGPL(v3) and AGPL(v3) ?

Both can be used in commercial production, both can also be packed within a payed product. As long as I do not change the source code of these, I am not forced to enclose the source code with my product.

So where lies the eminent difference?

(Asked this also at http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10996160/the-decisive-difference-between-lgpl-and-agpl, but a user suggested to ask it here.)

share|improve this question
2  
Please don't cross post. –  ChrisF Jun 12 '12 at 13:26
    
sorry for that, but I was suggested to ask that kind of question here instead of SO. I dont know why;( Where is the difference between programmers.stackexchange and SO ? –  nimo23 Jun 12 '12 at 13:40
    
Check the FAQ for the differences. At it's most basic SO is for coding problems, Programmers is for program design type questions. –  ChrisF Jun 12 '12 at 13:44
    
thanks! I get it:) –  nimo23 Jun 12 '12 at 13:51

1 Answer 1

up vote 6 down vote accepted

roughly, as long as you application isn't just a wrapper around the library:

  • LGPL: you can link against and don't have to release source code as long as you don't modify the library itself
  • GPL: you have to release source code if you link against and distribute the binary, but don't if you just provide a service
  • AGPL: you have to allow the source to be downloaded even if you never distribute the binary but do provide a service

i.e. your understanding of the LGPL is probably correct but your understanding of the AGPL is very wrong

as always if you want proper advice for your use-case you need to hire a lawyer

share|improve this answer
    
thanks jk - your answer is great! Imagine, I use MongoDB (which is licensed under AGPL) and provide a commercial website for users. Does every user need to know, that she is allowed to download the source of my website? How should I fullfill AGPL in such a case? –  nimo23 Jun 12 '12 at 13:48
    
every user should be able to download the source, how prominently you need to advertise this I do not know, you would need a lawyer to advise on that –  jk. Jun 12 '12 at 14:00
    
Okay thanks you have answered my question fine! –  nimo23 Jun 12 '12 at 14:08
    
@nimo23 : more precisely about MongoDB licensing, you are safe because they clearly state that we promise that your client application which uses the database is a separate work see here : mongodb.org/display/DOCS/Licensing –  Justin T. Jun 12 '12 at 17:02
    
@Justin T: what does "...is a separate work" mean? Imagine 2 scenarios: scenario I: "I have a commercial website online and I use mongodb as a backend, so all users can use my website and I am not forced to adhere to terms of AGPL as my website is a separate work". Scenario II: "I have a website and I use mongodb as a backend, I will sell the website to other customer and I am not forced to adhere to terms of AGPL as my website is a separate work". Are the 2 scenarios legal and right? –  nimo23 Jun 13 '12 at 11:30

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.