Take the 2-minute tour ×
Programmers Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional programmers interested in conceptual questions about software development. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The often known as likely and unlikely macros help the compiler know whether an if is usually going to be entered or skipped. Using it results in some (rather minor) performance improvements.

I started using them recently, and I'm not sure how often should such hints be used. I currently use it with error checking ifs, which are usually marked as unlikely. For example:

mem = malloc(size);
if (unlikely(mem == NULL))
  goto exit_no_mem;

It seems ok, but error-checking ifs happen quite often and consequently the use of the said macros.

My question is, is it too much to have likely and unlikely macros on every error-checking if?

While we're at it, what other places are they often used?

Edit: Even though my question is more general, but in my current usage it's in a library that makes an abstraction from the real-time subsystem, so programs would become portable between RTAI, QNX and others. That said, most of the functions are rather small and directly call one or two other functions. Many are even static inline functions.

So, first of all, it's not an application I could profile. It doesn't make sense to "identify bottle-necks" since it's a library, not a standalone application.

Second, it's kind of like "I know this is unlikely, I might as well tell it to the compiler". I don't actively try to optimize the if.

share|improve this question
reeks of micro optimizing to me... –  ratchet freak Mar 1 '13 at 11:40
For application code, I'd add them only if profiling showed that this code is used in a hot path. –  CodesInChaos Mar 1 '13 at 11:59
akkadia.org/drepper/cpumemory.pdf Page 57 –  James Mar 1 '13 at 12:33
@james, that just says likely and unlikely exist and what they do. I didn't find anything that would actually suggest when and where it is best to use them. –  Shahbaz Mar 1 '13 at 13:25
@Shahbaz "If the condition is frequently false, the execution is not linear. There is a big chunk of unused code in the middle which not only pollutes the L1i due to prefetch- ing, it also can cause problems with branch prediction. If the branch prediction is wrong the conditional expression can be very inefficient." So, tight loops where you want to make sure the instructions you need are in L1i cache –  James Mar 1 '13 at 14:16

1 Answer 1

Do you need performance that badly that you're willing to pollute your code with that? It's a minor optimization.

  • Does the code run in a tight loop?
  • Does your application have performance problems?
  • Have you profiled your application and determined that this particular loop costs a lot of CPU time?

Unless you can answer yes to all the above, don't bother with stuff like this.

Edit: in response to the edit. Even when you can't profile, you can usually estimate hotspots. A memory allocation function that is called by everyone is a good candidate, especially since it requires only a single use of the macro to work for the whole library.

share|improve this answer
Just to be clear, I didn't down-vote you. However, your answer doesn't really answer my question. Are you trying to say that (un)likely macro is rarely used and only in extremely performance critical code? Is it "bad practice" to use it often, or just "unnecessary"? –  Shahbaz Mar 1 '13 at 12:22

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.