What recent studies point to the possible improvement a programmer can make as a result of personal character traits?

Question

In Chapter 33, Personal Character of Code Complete (Second ed.) McConnell cites some studies such as those listed below in support of the assertion that 10-1 improvement is possible from efforts in improving our programming as a result of personal determination to improve.

• Sackman, Erikson, and Grant 1968;
• Curtis 1981; Mills 1983;
• DeMarco and Lister 1985;
• Curtis et al. 1986;
• Card 1987;
• Valett and McGarry 1989

As you can see from the list above, these studies are quite dated. Have more recent studies been conducted that studied potential for improvement in programming efficacy? How do the findings compare to McConnell's research? What have these studies revealed about the progress modern methods and tools had in our ability to program?

Answer 1

I would try to explain how it is I can be a programming genius in spite of having none the traits listed in this 1998 study but I hear a video game calling and I'm sick and tired of explaining myself to you people!

http://analytics.ncsu.edu/sesug/2005/SER06_05.PDF

Also, complete coincidence, (I found it after my comment above), Myers Briggs ratings. Not much on tools unfortunately and more of a paper than a study but lots of references within to more recent stuff.