Programmers Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional programmers interested in conceptual questions about software development. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

A group of us were wondering whether or not to go with CC0 or WTFPL because the CC0 explicitly states lack of liability.

Does the WTFPL, if used properly, also free the author(s) from liability of usage?

share|improve this question

closed as not a real question by Robert Harvey, gnat, Bart van Ingen Schenau, GlenH7, Yusubov Jun 6 '13 at 13:00

It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, visit the help center.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

The WTFPL doesn't say anything at all about legal liability. How can it free you from liability if it doesn't address it at all? Moreover, I wouldn't consider the WTFPL authoritative in any way with respect to creating an actual license. – Robert Harvey Jun 6 '13 at 4:00

No. if WTFPL is used as it is, it does not free the author from liabilities. Check the answer for Why is there no “no warranty” clause? in FAQ.

You are required to add (explicitly) NO WARRANTY clause.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.