Take the 2-minute tour ×
Programmers Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional programmers interested in conceptual questions about software development. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The main advantage is the use of ReSharper and other add-ons but we need to make a convincing argument for the purchase of Visual Studio 2012 Professional. We are currently using Visual Studio 2012 Express for Windows. It is quite good but is hard to switch from using the full Professional version in the past.

So far the team has compiled the following list:

  1. Extract Interface function missing. Very useful for clean SOLID code.
  2. No add-on support. Can’t install StyleCop or productivity tools. AnkhSvn, Spell checker, Productivity PowerTools, GhostDoc, Regex Editor, PowerCommands.
  3. The exception assistant is limited in Express edition. This is a big annoyance. See http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2013/01/ive-given-up-on-visual-studio-express-2012-for-windows-desktop-heres-why/
  4. Different tools provided by MS like certificate generation.
  5. Possibility of create a Test project based on source code.

We do server development in C# so any web add-ons or anything else is useless.

The reason I am asking is I am sure that people have been in the same position. What approach did you use and can you think of additions or ammends to the above list?

Thanks,

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by BЈовић, Bart van Ingen Schenau, MichaelT, GlenH7, Bryan Oakley Jul 1 '13 at 13:59

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "Questions seeking career advice or help with office politics are off-topic here unless they're specific to the programming profession. If people in other professions face similar problems, ask about it on The Workplace Stack Exchange." – BЈовић, Bart van Ingen Schenau, MichaelT, Bryan Oakley
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

2  
Note that Ultimate version is even better. After using Visual Studio 2010 Ultimate for years, I find Visual Studio 2012 Professional I have at workplace quite limited (especially for testing and modeling). –  MainMa Jul 1 '13 at 7:45
9  
I wouldn't take a .Net job if they didn't have at least Professional on an MSDN subscription. If they don't take your tools seriously it's the same thing as not taking you seriously. I'd make your case and say that the full version is required by you to do your job, and if your boss refuses go find another job where they value their developers instead. –  Keith Jul 1 '13 at 10:23
3  
@Keith, that's rather closed minded but I understand your point. VS Express is surprisingly productive. This is a startup. The job could still be awesome. We're probably going to get VS Pro, the company is 3 months old - we have to justify the cost. –  Sam Leach Jul 1 '13 at 12:07
1  
I don't have equity. :( –  Sam Leach Jul 1 '13 at 13:26
4  
Wait - you're a startup? Then Visual Studio and other good stuff should be free, or very cheap, through Microsoft BizSpark. If your company is less than 5 years old and making less than 1 million US $ a year, you qualify. –  MarkJ Jul 1 '13 at 20:04

1 Answer 1

  • Calculate how much hours you save with this per week.
  • Multiply the amount with your workweeks per year.
  • Multiply this with the amount of money they pay you per hour.
  • Subtract the price of VS2012 Prof. from the result.
share|improve this answer
6  
+1 given that VS seems to have at most a two yearly release cycle you can probably do the calculation over two years instead –  jk. Jul 1 '13 at 8:04
1  
@jk The last VS was 2012, the next VS is 2013. I think they're moving to yearly releases. –  Keith Jul 1 '13 at 10:13
1  
What about when customers are getting charged by the hour? In that case it's harder to make an argument that upgrading is financially viable. –  MatsT Jul 1 '13 at 13:15
1  
@jwenting - I don't see how that answers MatsT. The customer usually doesn't care what software you use to do the development, so long as you're using the technologies you agreed on. I can't think of any reason a client would insist on Resharper being used, for instance. –  Bobson Jul 1 '13 at 14:51
6  
@MatsT - Deliberately working slower in order to charge the customer more is a very shady business practice, and that's effectively what you'd be doing in that case. –  Bobson Jul 1 '13 at 14:54

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.