Sign up ×
Programmers Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional programmers interested in conceptual questions about software development. It's 100% free.

does someone know where this quote comes from? I don't know it literally, but I know what is is about. Something like:

Writing code more than once is a waste of energy and creativity.

I think that it was in some article about the definition of hacking or so, but I can't find it.

share|improve this question

closed as off topic by Mark Trapp Dec 5 '11 at 19:04

Questions on Programmers Stack Exchange are expected to relate to software development within the scope defined by the community. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about reopening questions here.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Well Googling for the exact phrase reveals - just this question!… - so that didn't help ;) – ChrisF Dec 12 '10 at 17:55
I wonder if this question is better served on – Gary Rowe Dec 12 '10 at 23:07
@Gary: How do you figure? This isn't a question about the English language. – Adam Lear Dec 12 '10 at 23:17
@Anna Just simply that requests for origins of quotes and phrases come up frequently on the site and that the audience there may have better research facilities for this type of question. I'm not suggesting a vote to close because I see this type of quote as constructive to a programmer. Rather, @thejh may find this question gets better answers from a different type of specialist. – Gary Rowe Dec 13 '10 at 9:19

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

Potentially a paraphrasing of this:

A lot of modern programming focusses on making code reusable and modulated. This is clearly a good idea since there is no point writing code more than once since it is just a waste of time and gets pretty boring.

from Quantumstate's blog article "Reusing Code". The original link fails due to a Database error, but the Google cache seems OK in Dec 2010.

share|improve this answer
Not exactly what I was looking for, but should work for me, too. – thejh Dec 13 '10 at 21:43

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.