Why more or less monitors is worse than your configuration?
Why is important use it in this way (position)?
Productivity is obvious, but what specific advantage?
A picture would be nice.
locked by Yannis Rizos♦ Dec 21 '13 at 8:48
This question exists because it has historical significance, but it is not considered a good, on-topic question for this site, so please do not use it as evidence that you can ask similar questions here. This question and its answers are frozen and cannot be changed. More info: help center.
closed as not constructive by Walter, Mark Trapp Oct 5 '11 at 16:58
As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
|show 1 more comment|
1 monitor (15.6", 1024x800, notebook), 3 virtual desktop (Compiz-Fusion):
Sometimes I use my desktop monitor for displaying docs.
3 x 22" Dell Ultrasharp.
Two of them connected to Ubuntu desktop machine (on which I actually run my development env). One of them connected to Windows laptop (which I use for mostly for communicating with the rest of the company and web browsing).
So it's: 1. consoles 2. IDE 3. Outlook/Web Browser