Programmers Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional programmers interested in conceptual questions about software development. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Among the 11 proven practices for more effective, efficient peer code review, diff annotation seems to be the one particularly well suited to tool assistance. The article is written by the architect of SmartBear's CodeCollaborator, so he of course recommends using that. Does anyone know of any alternatives? I can't think of anything that would be even close to paper+pen+marker in pure developer efficiency when it comes to explaining a piece of code.

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by GlenH7, MichaelT, Dan Pichelman, Tulains Córdova, gnat Feb 12 '15 at 4:38

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "Questions asking us to recommend a tool, library or favorite off-site resource are off-topic for Programmers as they tend to attract opinionated answers and spam. Instead, describe the problem and what has been done so far to solve it." – GlenH7, Community, Dan Pichelman, Tulains Córdova, gnat
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

up vote 2 down vote accepted

I use SmartBear's CodeCollaborator at work, and find it really streamlines the review process. I'd definately consider it.

There are also some open source alternatives worth investigating:

Reitveld - This Python based tool is loosely based on Googles internal code review tool (Mondrian).

Review Board - Another open source review tool

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.