Take the 2-minute tour ×
Programmers Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional programmers interested in conceptual questions about software development. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I had a small project that I was doing on the side. It was basically a couple of forms linked to a DB. Access was out, because it was a specifically meant to be a web application. Being a small project I used ASP.NET Dynamic Data, but, for various reasons, the project ended before deployment. I met the client recently, and he said there was a need for it still.

I'm considering restarting the project with Dynamic Data, but I've seen some Lightswitch demos, and was suitably impressed with the BETA. I will wait for RTM if I use it, but is it a good idea to use Lightswitch to replace the Dynamic Data? The amount of work I put into the Dynamic Data site isn't really an issue.

Additional information: It's a system that tracks production in a small factory, broken down by line, machine, section and will generate reports. I would guess that the data structure will remain fairly constant over time, but that the reporting requirements will grow. The other thing is that the factory is part of a larger group, and I'm hopeful that, if this system succeeds, similar work with be forthcoming for other factories.

share|improve this question
    
How comfortable are you that the requirements will NEVER CHANGE to the point of needing the additional flexibility that Dynamic Data and ASP.NET could provide? –  aceinthehole Jun 30 '11 at 13:15
    
I doubt that there will be significant changes. The factory has been running in its current configuration for at least 10 years. –  Elson Jun 30 '11 at 15:41

1 Answer 1

An important note here is that LightSwitch isn't actually a web app. It can be a Silverlight app that's web deployed. So if a web based approach is a requirement, then keep that in mind.

Now would LightSwitch work better than a DynamicData application? It's hard to say, play with it a while and figure out what you feel more comfortable with. Being a web developer for a long time I'd rather use DynamicData personally.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.