9
votes
4answers
442 views

Are first-class functions a substitute for the Strategy pattern?

The Strategy design pattern is often regarded as a substitute for first-class functions in languages that lack them. So for example say you wanted to pass functionality into an object. In Java you'd ...
28
votes
8answers
5k views

Is splitting up a function into several inner functions an anti-pattern? [duplicate]

Imagine a long and complicated process, which is started by calling function foo(). There are several consecutive steps in this process, each of them depending on result of the previous step. The ...
1
vote
3answers
115 views

Reason to treat internal class variables and functions inside a class as “separate” entities

Note: there is a similar question that addresses my subject: Better style for member variables? ... but that question does not address "dealing with large legacy code base and comprehension of ...
33
votes
6answers
2k views

Why is “tight coupling between functions and data” bad?

I found this quote in "The Joy of Clojure" on p. 32, but someone said the same thing to me over dinner last week and I've heard it other places as well: [A] downside to object-oriented programming ...
1
vote
6answers
389 views

Naming functions that retrieve a value

I have this personal rule to start all function/method names with a verb. My verb of choice for functions or methods that get a value based on some data structure or object is get. I'm wondering if ...
3
votes
2answers
298 views

Should I use chained functions in Java?

From time to time, I'll have a class in Java that takes a multitude of parameters, however, sometimes when I am creating an object of this class, I don't need to use all the parameters. As of now, I ...