Lesser General Public License

learn more… | top users | synonyms

0
votes
2answers
100 views

Minified version of JavaScript library under LGPL used on a site without copyright notice

On this site hackfind.com the autor put minified version of my library without any copyright notice. Is this violation of the LGPL. Note that using on a site is not a copy.
28
votes
3answers
2k views

Forking GPL project: Do I have full rights on the new fork or still dependencies with the original owner(s)

I am considering the creation of a fork to a small project licensed under GPLv2, and I have some very specific questions I did not manage to answer in my research on various sites and foras. When I ...
1
vote
0answers
27 views

Difference between MPL 2.0 and LGPL 2.1 (+static linking exception)? [duplicate]

Is there a difference between MPL 2.0 and LGPL 2.1 (+static linking exception)? If yes, what is it? As long as i understand the only difference between them is you can't use trademarks of ...
0
votes
3answers
211 views

Can I use Apache Software License, Version 2.0 and GNU LGPL 3 licence plugins in my commercial web application?

I have two plug-ins. One has the GNU LGPL 3 license and the other has the Apache Software License, Version 2.0. Can I use them in my commercial app? And if yes, what precautions should I take?
0
votes
2answers
109 views

Use of LGPL libraries on android devices (in a single closed source .apk) [duplicate]

Well this question is actually asked multiple times here already. but the answers are contradictory So that's why I ask it again (maybe time changed things). Can LGPL licensed libraries be used in ...
1
vote
2answers
71 views

Can some LGPL library published upgrades use a commercial library?

I am using a LGPL v3 library and have made upgrades to it. Before using these upgrades, I understand I have to publish them. That's al-right. Is it legal if I perform upgrades that use a commercial ...
2
votes
1answer
444 views

Mozilla Public License (MPL 2.0) vs Lesser GNU General Public License (LGPL 3.0)

I would like to release a software library written in a class-based, object-oriented programming language (Java) on a web-based source code hosting service, that allows forks of the project to be ...
1
vote
1answer
96 views

How to use apache license in my project which will be LGPL

I want to use LGPL for my project, can I use some source code which is apache licensed ? If I only use the apache licensed component as library in my project, how should I make the clarification in ...
3
votes
4answers
243 views

Releasing a project under GPL v2 or later without the source code of libraries

I wrote a system in Java that I want to release under the terms of GPL v2 or later. I've used Apache Maven to deal with all the dependencies of the system, so I don't have the source code of any of ...
0
votes
1answer
100 views

How to handle licensing of Ruby on Rails code, which contains a LGPL library?

My company wants to release the code for a Ruby on Rails demo app, which includes our own LGPL'd library code. It it legally kosher for me to state that the contents of the entire repo are released ...
1
vote
1answer
80 views

Mixed licenses inside product

This question relates to software-licensing. Someone familiar with open-source licensing may be able to answer this question. I am facing an issue in trying to interpret/understand some Licenses, due ...
1
vote
1answer
171 views

Using jTransforms for a commercial (non-free) android application?

I am developing an application which is using JTransforms to compute FFT and InverseFFT. I am planning to sell that application on Play Store. The JTransforms Library is covered under MPL/LGPL/GPL ...
2
votes
1answer
160 views

Releasing open-source software including Apache2 and LGPL libraries?

I am writing software (in Java) using three libraries: Library A, licensed under MIT license Library B, licensed under Apache License, Version 2.0 Library C, licensed under LGPLv3 I would like to ...
0
votes
1answer
102 views

LGPL and commerical application in PHP

I have rather specific question about licensing but first of all I would just like to state that I already read a lot of Q&A's here but I'm still not sure about the problem in that particular ...
0
votes
1answer
116 views

Using source code under LGPL in .NET, converted from JAVA?

I found one JAVA project useful to our commercial software which is developed using C#. The JAVA project is under LGPL. My understanding is (please correct me if I am wrong) if I use one compiled LGPL ...
3
votes
2answers
483 views

use of LGPL libraries in closed source android software

I'm investigating the legal issues of using LGPL native libraries in a closed source Android software. As for now, my research on the subject shows that using LGPL libraries in closed source software ...
0
votes
1answer
78 views

Static linking with modified LGPL code

I'm writing a library which links with modified LGPL library,so two questions: Do I have to make my code LGPL in case of static linking with LGPL library? in case of dynamic linking?
4
votes
1answer
60 views

License change of original source from Apache 2.0 to LGPL

About a year or so ago, I forked a project licensed under Apache 2.0 and made extensive changes and additions to the code, a good portion of which I contributed back freely to the community. ...
5
votes
1answer
417 views

Looking for a popular, well known example of closed-source software which uses LGPL code, and says so

For advocacy purposes, I'm looking for a good example of some popular/widely-known closed-source and generally paid-for software application/package which uses dynamically linked LGPL-licensed ...
1
vote
2answers
262 views

Can I use a LGPL licensed library for my web project

I am looking to use a javascript libray licensed under the LGPL license v3. From what I have read so far, I understand that If I do not make any modifications to the library, I can use the library ...
2
votes
1answer
94 views

Does the ability to start a GPL add-on GPL-ize a program (Gstreamer)

This question is asked in regards to gstreamer but it could apply to any add-on based architecture. I have a Gstreamer based application that can ship as proprietary because I use unmodified ...
0
votes
1answer
274 views

Qt solutions have been re-licensed, can I use the src directly now

I have a commercial application that uses a Qt Solutions component. Until recently, this component was licensed under the LGPL license, so I was forced to use the component in the form of a shared ...
1
vote
2answers
200 views

GPL/LGPL/MPL non-code content license

I want to use a dictionary (basically a text file, and no code) that is included with an open office spell checking plug-in. The plug-in is under the tri-license GPL/LGPL/MPL which I don't understand. ...
1
vote
0answers
12 views

Can I build a closed source plugin for a LGPL library?

If I link a program dynamically to a LGPL library (here GTK+/GLib), I'm allowed to distribute the program on my own terms (non-copyleft). Now, the LGPL library provides loadable modules. Place a ...
2
votes
1answer
311 views

LGPL, .lib, .dll, and linking

I am trying to build a project which uses an unmodified copy of libconfig (http://www.hyperrealm.com/libconfig/). libconfig is LGPL, but I don't want to open source any of my code. By my ...
1
vote
2answers
346 views

Developer name in the copyright notice of files contributed to open source project?

I am developing a small application which I want to make open source. Currently only my work is on the application, and so in all the files I have put up a copyright notice in my name. Now when I ...
1
vote
1answer
2k views

LGPL 2.1 vs LGPL 3.0 Advantages and Disadvantages

From what I've read, LGPL 3.0 allows you to use the license together with other licenses, more permissive about that(Not even sure about that). From ...
3
votes
2answers
382 views

LGPLv3 in closed embedded environment

I'm thinking of using a LGPLv3 library in a closed source commercial program running in a closed embedded environment. According to what I know from LGPLv3 licensing, I can use it as long as the ...
6
votes
2answers
321 views

Writing proprietary and possibly closed source software while avoiding license infractions

I am starting a software project that I want to have the option to keep it proprietary. However, since I generally use a Linux environment, I want to know: How do people write proprietary software in ...
8
votes
4answers
2k views

Is there a modified LGPL license that allows static linking?

LGPL requires that it if a program uses LGPL-ed library, users must be able to re-link the program with a different version of the library: ... d) Do one of the following: 0) Convey the ...
3
votes
3answers
320 views

How do I avoid GPL violations?

When I'm releasing a program, I like to license it under the GPL or LGPL. I also want to stay compliant with that license. I'm not good at reading legal documents, and the GPL3 is about 10 pages long. ...
3
votes
1answer
242 views

Am I permitted to use an LGPL library without releasing the source to the rest of my application, if I dynamically reference the library?

I am a bit confused as to what I am/am not allowed to do with a LGPL Library that I intend on using in a small scale commercial C++ Application that I am developing. My current understanding, although ...
2
votes
2answers
211 views

Have you used a Framework/Lib whose LGPL License? if yes, what are the impressions of your customers? [closed]

I am trying to make my first app for sale, I would like to ask some questions for those who have already sold their software: Have you used a Framework/Lib whose LGPL License? if yes, what are the ...
1
vote
2answers
1k views

LGPL License in commercial application

I have searched around but I don't seem to be able to get a clear answer on my questions that I understand. I want to use the Xuggler library in my application, which is licensed either GPL or LGPL ...
4
votes
1answer
2k views

the decisive difference between LGPL and AGPL

What is the decisive difference between LGPL(v3) and AGPL(v3) ? Both can be used in commercial production, both can also be packed within a payed product. As long as I do not change the source code ...
7
votes
1answer
300 views

What is the reason for section 1 of LGPL and what is the implication for section 9.

Why was section 1 added to LGPLv3? My understanding of section 3&4 is, one can convey the combined work under any license and with no requirements from GPLv3 (besides those explicitly stated as ...
11
votes
2answers
1k views

How does using a LGPL gem affect my MIT licensed application?

I am developing an open source ruby application under the MIT license. I am using this license because I don't want to place any restrictions on the users of the application. Also I can actually ...
3
votes
1answer
248 views

Dual-licensing LGPL 2.1 and LGPL 3

I maintain a software, a small PHP library, that is released under the LGPL version 3 license (LGPLv3). Someone wants to use the library in their software which has the GPL version 2 license. This ...
4
votes
2answers
439 views

Software bundle containing LGPL libraries as Java Fat-Jar Archive

At work, we're deploying a software bundle of a Java application (written by us) which has lots of external dependencies, most of them being LGPL and BSD-licensed third-party-libraries distributes as ...
2
votes
2answers
1k views

Protecting proprietary code linking with LGPL v3 code

I've been warned that LGPL v3 forbids any kind of modifications that would prevent reverse-engineering, including software protection such as obfuscation. In practice, does this license make it ...
3
votes
2answers
831 views

Should I include multiply license header notice in dual license software?

Is it necessarily if a software released under both of LGPL3 && GPL3 terms have to include both license header notice top of each file? Or just put GPL header notice? or simply put LGPL3 ...
12
votes
4answers
3k views

Does the LGPL allow me to do this?

I am planning to develop a commercial software using a LGPL software. In the LGPL software that I am using some functions in a class are not fully implemented. I want to modify the LGPL code so that ...
1
vote
2answers
316 views

How to get contributors assign copyright for copyright holder?

Let's say we have a company and we release our project under LGPL && GPLv3, as you know the only thing here is about contribution. People commit bug-fixes/features to the project, it's fine ...
2
votes
1answer
110 views

Is it possible to release a library based on the ASIO SDK under the LGPLv3?

I'm wondering if it's possible to write and release a library based on the ASIO SDK under the LGPLv3. More specifically, the ASIO license says something I'm not sure how to interpret (2.2) : The ...
3
votes
2answers
149 views

Is it considered “conveying” if I share modified LGPL v3 code on GitHub?

It is critical to know what constitutes "conveying" under LGPL v3. I am considering creating some software based on LGPL v3. The software will be used to run a web application. Now I wonder whether ...
8
votes
2answers
1k views

What constitutes “distributing” for LGPL v3

I am considering basing some new software on a LGPL web application. I want to utilize this new software for creating one website for my employer, and we do not intend to sell or distribute the ...
0
votes
1answer
474 views

LGPL open source license

I have recently become curious about open source licenses. I have a question about the LGPL. I created a Java web project and built it as a WAR package. Can I add LGPL jars to this WAR file?
2
votes
4answers
2k views

Can I use GPL, LGPL, MPL licensed packages with my application and make it closed source?

I saw a company is using BusyBox and also using Gpl + Lgpl + Mpl packages on it, and then they have there own application running on it. Their application is a closed source package. You buy the ...
1
vote
2answers
545 views

How does the license work for the LGPL open source framework?

Without knowing anything I wrote a big application, almost 1 year coding. It does Video/Audio such as softphone for commercial use (we sell it). I used a framework which was licensed under the LGPL, ...
1
vote
1answer
285 views

How can you use an LGPLv2.1 licenced AS3 library in a proprietary Flex app without “giving away the farm”?

Consider a Flex (actually AIR) application that is considered proprietary, but needs to use an LGPLv2.1 AS3 library, so that it is considered a "work that uses the Library" according to the license ...