0
votes
1answer
58 views

Linking against LGPL - How to share the code?

I'm working on an Open Source software project (LGPL) which uses another LGPL-licensed software. To make it easier for users and developers I'm delivering and linking against the compiled thirdparty. ...
3
votes
1answer
840 views

Mozilla Public License (MPL 2.0) vs Lesser GNU General Public License (LGPL 3.0)

I would like to release a software library written in a class-based, object-oriented programming language (Java) on a web-based source code hosting service, that allows forks of the project to be ...
1
vote
1answer
283 views

Using jTransforms for a commercial (non-free) android application?

I am developing an application which is using JTransforms to compute FFT and InverseFFT. I am planning to sell that application on Play Store. The JTransforms Library is covered under MPL/LGPL/GPL ...
1
vote
2answers
401 views

Developer name in the copyright notice of files contributed to open source project?

I am developing a small application which I want to make open source. Currently only my work is on the application, and so in all the files I have put up a copyright notice in my name. Now when I ...
2
votes
1answer
112 views

Is it possible to release a library based on the ASIO SDK under the LGPLv3?

I'm wondering if it's possible to write and release a library based on the ASIO SDK under the LGPLv3. More specifically, the ASIO license says something I'm not sure how to interpret (2.2) : The ...
3
votes
2answers
158 views

Is it considered “conveying” if I share modified LGPL v3 code on GitHub?

It is critical to know what constitutes "conveying" under LGPL v3. I am considering creating some software based on LGPL v3. The software will be used to run a web application. Now I wonder whether ...
9
votes
2answers
1k views

What constitutes “distributing” for LGPL v3

I am considering basing some new software on a LGPL web application. I want to utilize this new software for creating one website for my employer, and we do not intend to sell or distribute the ...
1
vote
2answers
566 views

How does the license work for the LGPL open source framework?

Without knowing anything I wrote a big application, almost 1 year coding. It does Video/Audio such as softphone for commercial use (we sell it). I used a framework which was licensed under the LGPL, ...
13
votes
1answer
2k views

Downsides of GNU LGPL v3 vs. GNU LGPL v2.1?

Firstly, I realize that this is a programming Q&A site, and not a place for legal advice.... Just trying to get a basic idea of what the downsides to using an LGPLv3 library might be. What ...
3
votes
2answers
293 views

Is distributing patches in compliance with the GPL?

I'm designing a distro and some of the software packages included are maintained in such a way that my source repository doesn't actually include the source code, but they are included as an ...
2
votes
3answers
211 views

Can I brand my open-source application?

Is it possible for the author to register a logo or the name of his/her application when it is open-source because it uses a gpl library (for example)? The application uses the library but it has its ...
0
votes
2answers
143 views

Questions about software licensing [duplicate]

I've been having a discussion about licensing and open source software. Basically - the other guy is saying that licensing is easy, if you're going to build a product you can use an (any) open source ...
2
votes
2answers
91 views

Options for software licensing for plugins?

I'm creating a software application where up until now, the majority of code and assets have been produced by me. There are smaller bits of code that I've taken from other places; these have all been ...
6
votes
4answers
2k views

Why is jQuery released under MIT and not LGPL?

Why is jQuery released under MIT and not LGPL? What are the benefits of using MIT compared to LGPL for a framework?
6
votes
5answers
268 views

Can I use open source libraries in trialware?

I have written a small Java program which i'd like to distribute on my website. I have used a few external librarys which declare following licences: Apache License (2.0), LGPL and one API doesn't ...
11
votes
8answers
1k views

I created a program based on an LGPL project, and I'm not allowed to publish the source code

I thought LGPL was a permissive license, just like MIT, BSD or Apache. But today I read, that only linking to LGPL (libraries etc) is allowed from closed-source code - other than that, it's copyleft - ...
3
votes
1answer
218 views

Is there any copyleft (GPL-like) license with both the Affero and Lesser modifications?

Looking for a license that covers public network service, like AGPLv3, but like LGPL isn't infectious. Basically I wrote some useful helper functions I want to allow to be used in any work, including ...
28
votes
7answers
1k views

Choosing a licence for open source projects

I've done some open source projects, and I plan to do more in the future. So far, I've released all my code under GPL, but I've read a few articles which claim GPL is too restrictive for any code to ...