Tagged Questions

Lesser General Public License

learn more… | top users | synonyms

0
votes
2answers
81 views

Shipping unmodified open source applications with closed source apps

I am creating a closed source application whose task is to launch other open source applications (similar to start menu of windows). So i have included various opensource applications under licences ...
1
vote
1answer
45 views

Using a zLib like icensed library which has dependencies on LGPL or GPL libs; what license am I able to release my project under?

If I use an Open Source library which is released under a zLib like license, but it has dependencies on libraries that are using LGPL or GPL; what license am I able to release my project under? If I ...
0
votes
1answer
246 views

FFmpeg: Can I replace libx264 with OpenH264 in order to go LGPL?

I have some video processing to run and FFmpeg already contains much of what I need. However my videos are all compressed with H.264 video codec and libx264 is a GPL part of FFmpeg. On the other hand, ...
0
votes
0answers
17 views

Porting an LGPLv3 library to a different language under Apache v2 License [duplicate]

Is it legal / ethical to port a library that is written in C under LGPLv3 to (pure) Go under the Apache v2 license? Keep in mind the port will be 100% compatible with full attribution to the original ...
0
votes
0answers
52 views

Can I include a modified GPL/Apache licensed font in my LGPL project?

I want to include a GPL & Apache duel-licensed font in my LGPL project, but didn't really find a clue if that's possible. There are two problems here: I didn't find any clue about Apache ...
4
votes
1answer
86 views

What precisely do I/my company need to do “make available/publish” source code changes and satisfy GPL/LGPL

This seems like a basic question, but I have not found a definitive source. I need to modify the source for an LGPL application for my employer to plug a security hole. Longer term we will upgrade to ...
1
vote
1answer
102 views

Can GPL v2 code link to an LGPL v3 library

If I write a library that is released under the terms of the GPL v2 (or higher, at option); may that library depend on another library released under the LGPL v3 (or higher), without implicitly ...
0
votes
1answer
156 views

Using LGPL Library with Java static or Dynamic linking

I've searched and read many posts about LGPL and C, and when I was able to find one that related to Java, my mind still didn't rest with ease, so I'll try to be more specific and hopefully get a ...
-1
votes
1answer
90 views

gnu lesser general public license question [closed]

I have a question about Thingiviews license. I have a site that has to do with 3D Printing, it is not done yet but I was wondering if I would be able to use it on my site, The big reason I am asking ...
0
votes
1answer
63 views

Linking against LGPL - How to share the code?

I'm working on an Open Source software project (LGPL) which uses another LGPL-licensed software. To make it easier for users and developers I'm delivering and linking against the compiled thirdparty. ...
0
votes
2answers
152 views

Minified version of JavaScript library under LGPL used on a site without copyright notice

On this site hackfind.com the autor put minified version of my library without any copyright notice. Is this violation of the LGPL. Note that using on a site is not a copy.
29
votes
3answers
2k views

Forking GPL project: Do I have full rights on the new fork or still dependencies with the original owner(s)

I am considering the creation of a fork to a small project licensed under GPLv2, and I have some very specific questions I did not manage to answer in my research on various sites and foras. When I ...
1
vote
0answers
27 views

Difference between MPL 2.0 and LGPL 2.1 (+static linking exception)? [duplicate]

Is there a difference between MPL 2.0 and LGPL 2.1 (+static linking exception)? If yes, what is it? As long as i understand the only difference between them is you can't use trademarks of ...
1
vote
3answers
1k views

Can I use Apache Software License, Version 2.0 and GNU LGPL 3 licence plugins in my commercial web application?

I have two plug-ins. One has the GNU LGPL 3 license and the other has the Apache Software License, Version 2.0. Can I use them in my commercial app? And if yes, what precautions should I take?
1
vote
2answers
390 views

Use of LGPL libraries on android devices (in a single closed source .apk) [duplicate]

Well this question is actually asked multiple times here already. but the answers are contradictory So that's why I ask it again (maybe time changed things). Can LGPL licensed libraries be used in ...
1
vote
2answers
81 views

Can some LGPL library published upgrades use a commercial library?

I am using a LGPL v3 library and have made upgrades to it. Before using these upgrades, I understand I have to publish them. That's al-right. Is it legal if I perform upgrades that use a commercial ...
3
votes
1answer
1k views

Mozilla Public License (MPL 2.0) vs Lesser GNU General Public License (LGPL 3.0)

I would like to release a software library written in a class-based, object-oriented programming language (Java) on a web-based source code hosting service, that allows forks of the project to be ...
1
vote
1answer
162 views

How to use apache license in my project which will be LGPL

I want to use LGPL for my project, can I use some source code which is apache licensed ? If I only use the apache licensed component as library in my project, how should I make the clarification in ...
4
votes
4answers
312 views

Releasing a project under GPL v2 or later without the source code of libraries

I wrote a system in Java that I want to release under the terms of GPL v2 or later. I've used Apache Maven to deal with all the dependencies of the system, so I don't have the source code of any of ...
0
votes
1answer
188 views

How to handle licensing of Ruby on Rails code, which contains a LGPL library?

My company wants to release the code for a Ruby on Rails demo app, which includes our own LGPL'd library code. It it legally kosher for me to state that the contents of the entire repo are released ...
1
vote
1answer
85 views

Mixed licenses inside product

This question relates to software-licensing. Someone familiar with open-source licensing may be able to answer this question. I am facing an issue in trying to interpret/understand some Licenses, due ...
1
vote
1answer
374 views

Using jTransforms for a commercial (non-free) android application?

I am developing an application which is using JTransforms to compute FFT and InverseFFT. I am planning to sell that application on Play Store. The JTransforms Library is covered under MPL/LGPL/GPL ...
2
votes
1answer
222 views

Releasing open-source software including Apache2 and LGPL libraries?

I am writing software (in Java) using three libraries: Library A, licensed under MIT license Library B, licensed under Apache License, Version 2.0 Library C, licensed under LGPLv3 I would like to ...
0
votes
1answer
162 views

LGPL and commerical application in PHP

I have rather specific question about licensing but first of all I would just like to state that I already read a lot of Q&A's here but I'm still not sure about the problem in that particular ...
0
votes
1answer
154 views

Using source code under LGPL in .NET, converted from JAVA?

I found one JAVA project useful to our commercial software which is developed using C#. The JAVA project is under LGPL. My understanding is (please correct me if I am wrong) if I use one compiled LGPL ...
3
votes
2answers
788 views

use of LGPL libraries in closed source android software

I'm investigating the legal issues of using LGPL native libraries in a closed source Android software. As for now, my research on the subject shows that using LGPL libraries in closed source software ...
1
vote
1answer
141 views

Static linking with modified LGPL code

I'm writing a library which links with modified LGPL library,so two questions: Do I have to make my code LGPL in case of static linking with LGPL library? in case of dynamic linking?
4
votes
1answer
65 views

License change of original source from Apache 2.0 to LGPL

About a year or so ago, I forked a project licensed under Apache 2.0 and made extensive changes and additions to the code, a good portion of which I contributed back freely to the community. ...
5
votes
1answer
479 views

Looking for a popular, well known example of closed-source software which uses LGPL code, and says so

For advocacy purposes, I'm looking for a good example of some popular/widely-known closed-source and generally paid-for software application/package which uses dynamically linked LGPL-licensed ...
1
vote
2answers
368 views

Can I use a LGPL licensed library for my web project

I am looking to use a javascript libray licensed under the LGPL license v3. From what I have read so far, I understand that If I do not make any modifications to the library, I can use the library ...
2
votes
1answer
109 views

Does the ability to start a GPL add-on GPL-ize a program (Gstreamer)

This question is asked in regards to gstreamer but it could apply to any add-on based architecture. I have a Gstreamer based application that can ship as proprietary because I use unmodified ...
0
votes
1answer
378 views

Qt solutions have been re-licensed, can I use the src directly now

I have a commercial application that uses a Qt Solutions component. Until recently, this component was licensed under the LGPL license, so I was forced to use the component in the form of a shared ...
1
vote
2answers
225 views

GPL/LGPL/MPL non-code content license

I want to use a dictionary (basically a text file, and no code) that is included with an open office spell checking plug-in. The plug-in is under the tri-license GPL/LGPL/MPL which I don't understand. ...
1
vote
0answers
29 views

Can I build a closed source plugin for a LGPL library?

If I link a program dynamically to a LGPL library (here GTK+/GLib), I'm allowed to distribute the program on my own terms (non-copyleft). Now, the LGPL library provides loadable modules. Place a ...
4
votes
1answer
417 views

LGPL, .lib, .dll, and linking

I am trying to build a project which uses an unmodified copy of libconfig (http://www.hyperrealm.com/libconfig/). libconfig is LGPL, but I don't want to open source any of my code. By my ...
2
votes
2answers
464 views

Developer name in the copyright notice of files contributed to open source project?

I am developing a small application which I want to make open source. Currently only my work is on the application, and so in all the files I have put up a copyright notice in my name. Now when I ...
7
votes
1answer
4k views

LGPL 2.1 vs LGPL 3.0 Advantages and Disadvantages

From what I've read, LGPL 3.0 allows you to use the license together with other licenses, more permissive about that(Not even sure about that). From ...
3
votes
2answers
629 views

LGPLv3 in closed embedded environment

I'm thinking of using a LGPLv3 library in a closed source commercial program running in a closed embedded environment. According to what I know from LGPLv3 licensing, I can use it as long as the ...
6
votes
2answers
370 views

Writing proprietary and possibly closed source software while avoiding license infractions

I am starting a software project that I want to have the option to keep it proprietary. However, since I generally use a Linux environment, I want to know: How do people write proprietary software in ...
8
votes
4answers
3k views

Is there a modified LGPL license that allows static linking?

LGPL requires that it if a program uses LGPL-ed library, users must be able to re-link the program with a different version of the library: ... d) Do one of the following: 0) Convey the ...
3
votes
3answers
331 views

How do I avoid GPL violations?

When I'm releasing a program, I like to license it under the GPL or LGPL. I also want to stay compliant with that license. I'm not good at reading legal documents, and the GPL3 is about 10 pages long. ...
3
votes
1answer
292 views

Am I permitted to use an LGPL library without releasing the source to the rest of my application, if I dynamically reference the library?

I am a bit confused as to what I am/am not allowed to do with a LGPL Library that I intend on using in a small scale commercial C++ Application that I am developing. My current understanding, although ...
2
votes
2answers
221 views

Have you used a Framework/Lib whose LGPL License? if yes, what are the impressions of your customers? [closed]

I am trying to make my first app for sale, I would like to ask some questions for those who have already sold their software: Have you used a Framework/Lib whose LGPL License? if yes, what are the ...
1
vote
2answers
2k views

LGPL License in commercial application

I have searched around but I don't seem to be able to get a clear answer on my questions that I understand. I want to use the Xuggler library in my application, which is licensed either GPL or LGPL ...
4
votes
1answer
3k views

the decisive difference between LGPL and AGPL

What is the decisive difference between LGPL(v3) and AGPL(v3) ? Both can be used in commercial production, both can also be packed within a payed product. As long as I do not change the source code ...
7
votes
1answer
328 views

What is the reason for section 1 of LGPL and what is the implication for section 9.

Why was section 1 added to LGPLv3? My understanding of section 3&4 is, one can convey the combined work under any license and with no requirements from GPLv3 (besides those explicitly stated as ...
12
votes
2answers
1k views

How does using a LGPL gem affect my MIT licensed application?

I am developing an open source ruby application under the MIT license. I am using this license because I don't want to place any restrictions on the users of the application. Also I can actually ...
3
votes
1answer
267 views

Dual-licensing LGPL 2.1 and LGPL 3

I maintain a software, a small PHP library, that is released under the LGPL version 3 license (LGPLv3). Someone wants to use the library in their software which has the GPL version 2 license. This ...
4
votes
2answers
545 views

Software bundle containing LGPL libraries as Java Fat-Jar Archive

At work, we're deploying a software bundle of a Java application (written by us) which has lots of external dependencies, most of them being LGPL and BSD-licensed third-party-libraries distributes as ...
2
votes
2answers
1k views

Protecting proprietary code linking with LGPL v3 code

I've been warned that LGPL v3 forbids any kind of modifications that would prevent reverse-engineering, including software protection such as obfuscation. In practice, does this license make it ...