1
vote
1answer
59 views

Can GPL v2 code link to an LGPL v3 library

If I write a library that is released under the terms of the GPL v2 (or higher, at option); may that library depend on another library released under the LGPL v3 (or higher), without implicitly ...
0
votes
1answer
62 views

Using LGPL Library with Java static or Dynamic linking

I've searched and read many posts about LGPL and C, and when I was able to find one that related to Java, my mind still didn't rest with ease, so I'll try to be more specific and hopefully get a ...
0
votes
1answer
58 views

Linking against LGPL - How to share the code?

I'm working on an Open Source software project (LGPL) which uses another LGPL-licensed software. To make it easier for users and developers I'm delivering and linking against the compiled thirdparty. ...
0
votes
2answers
119 views

Minified version of JavaScript library under LGPL used on a site without copyright notice

On this site hackfind.com the autor put minified version of my library without any copyright notice. Is this violation of the LGPL. Note that using on a site is not a copy.
1
vote
0answers
27 views

Difference between MPL 2.0 and LGPL 2.1 (+static linking exception)? [duplicate]

Is there a difference between MPL 2.0 and LGPL 2.1 (+static linking exception)? If yes, what is it? As long as i understand the only difference between them is you can't use trademarks of ...
1
vote
3answers
659 views

Can I use Apache Software License, Version 2.0 and GNU LGPL 3 licence plugins in my commercial web application?

I have two plug-ins. One has the GNU LGPL 3 license and the other has the Apache Software License, Version 2.0. Can I use them in my commercial app? And if yes, what precautions should I take?
3
votes
1answer
791 views

Mozilla Public License (MPL 2.0) vs Lesser GNU General Public License (LGPL 3.0)

I would like to release a software library written in a class-based, object-oriented programming language (Java) on a web-based source code hosting service, that allows forks of the project to be ...
3
votes
4answers
277 views

Releasing a project under GPL v2 or later without the source code of libraries

I wrote a system in Java that I want to release under the terms of GPL v2 or later. I've used Apache Maven to deal with all the dependencies of the system, so I don't have the source code of any of ...
0
votes
1answer
137 views

How to handle licensing of Ruby on Rails code, which contains a LGPL library?

My company wants to release the code for a Ruby on Rails demo app, which includes our own LGPL'd library code. It it legally kosher for me to state that the contents of the entire repo are released ...
1
vote
1answer
83 views

Mixed licenses inside product

This question relates to software-licensing. Someone familiar with open-source licensing may be able to answer this question. I am facing an issue in trying to interpret/understand some Licenses, due ...
1
vote
1answer
264 views

Using jTransforms for a commercial (non-free) android application?

I am developing an application which is using JTransforms to compute FFT and InverseFFT. I am planning to sell that application on Play Store. The JTransforms Library is covered under MPL/LGPL/GPL ...
2
votes
1answer
193 views

Releasing open-source software including Apache2 and LGPL libraries?

I am writing software (in Java) using three libraries: Library A, licensed under MIT license Library B, licensed under Apache License, Version 2.0 Library C, licensed under LGPLv3 I would like to ...
0
votes
1answer
133 views

LGPL and commerical application in PHP

I have rather specific question about licensing but first of all I would just like to state that I already read a lot of Q&A's here but I'm still not sure about the problem in that particular ...
0
votes
1answer
133 views

Using source code under LGPL in .NET, converted from JAVA?

I found one JAVA project useful to our commercial software which is developed using C#. The JAVA project is under LGPL. My understanding is (please correct me if I am wrong) if I use one compiled LGPL ...
1
vote
1answer
115 views

Static linking with modified LGPL code

I'm writing a library which links with modified LGPL library,so two questions: Do I have to make my code LGPL in case of static linking with LGPL library? in case of dynamic linking?
4
votes
1answer
63 views

License change of original source from Apache 2.0 to LGPL

About a year or so ago, I forked a project licensed under Apache 2.0 and made extensive changes and additions to the code, a good portion of which I contributed back freely to the community. ...
5
votes
1answer
441 views

Looking for a popular, well known example of closed-source software which uses LGPL code, and says so

For advocacy purposes, I'm looking for a good example of some popular/widely-known closed-source and generally paid-for software application/package which uses dynamically linked LGPL-licensed ...
1
vote
2answers
307 views

Can I use a LGPL licensed library for my web project

I am looking to use a javascript libray licensed under the LGPL license v3. From what I have read so far, I understand that If I do not make any modifications to the library, I can use the library ...
0
votes
1answer
323 views

Qt solutions have been re-licensed, can I use the src directly now

I have a commercial application that uses a Qt Solutions component. Until recently, this component was licensed under the LGPL license, so I was forced to use the component in the form of a shared ...
1
vote
2answers
215 views

GPL/LGPL/MPL non-code content license

I want to use a dictionary (basically a text file, and no code) that is included with an open office spell checking plug-in. The plug-in is under the tri-license GPL/LGPL/MPL which I don't understand. ...
3
votes
1answer
2k views

LGPL 2.1 vs LGPL 3.0 Advantages and Disadvantages

From what I've read, LGPL 3.0 allows you to use the license together with other licenses, more permissive about that(Not even sure about that). From ...
3
votes
2answers
470 views

LGPLv3 in closed embedded environment

I'm thinking of using a LGPLv3 library in a closed source commercial program running in a closed embedded environment. According to what I know from LGPLv3 licensing, I can use it as long as the ...
6
votes
2answers
344 views

Writing proprietary and possibly closed source software while avoiding license infractions

I am starting a software project that I want to have the option to keep it proprietary. However, since I generally use a Linux environment, I want to know: How do people write proprietary software in ...
8
votes
4answers
2k views

Is there a modified LGPL license that allows static linking?

LGPL requires that it if a program uses LGPL-ed library, users must be able to re-link the program with a different version of the library: ... d) Do one of the following: 0) Convey the ...
3
votes
3answers
324 views

How do I avoid GPL violations?

When I'm releasing a program, I like to license it under the GPL or LGPL. I also want to stay compliant with that license. I'm not good at reading legal documents, and the GPL3 is about 10 pages long. ...
2
votes
2answers
216 views

Have you used a Framework/Lib whose LGPL License? if yes, what are the impressions of your customers? [closed]

I am trying to make my first app for sale, I would like to ask some questions for those who have already sold their software: Have you used a Framework/Lib whose LGPL License? if yes, what are the ...
1
vote
2answers
1k views

LGPL License in commercial application

I have searched around but I don't seem to be able to get a clear answer on my questions that I understand. I want to use the Xuggler library in my application, which is licensed either GPL or LGPL ...
4
votes
1answer
3k views

the decisive difference between LGPL and AGPL

What is the decisive difference between LGPL(v3) and AGPL(v3) ? Both can be used in commercial production, both can also be packed within a payed product. As long as I do not change the source code ...
11
votes
2answers
1k views

How does using a LGPL gem affect my MIT licensed application?

I am developing an open source ruby application under the MIT license. I am using this license because I don't want to place any restrictions on the users of the application. Also I can actually ...
3
votes
1answer
253 views

Dual-licensing LGPL 2.1 and LGPL 3

I maintain a software, a small PHP library, that is released under the LGPL version 3 license (LGPLv3). Someone wants to use the library in their software which has the GPL version 2 license. This ...
2
votes
2answers
1k views

Protecting proprietary code linking with LGPL v3 code

I've been warned that LGPL v3 forbids any kind of modifications that would prevent reverse-engineering, including software protection such as obfuscation. In practice, does this license make it ...
3
votes
2answers
886 views

Should I include multiply license header notice in dual license software?

Is it necessarily if a software released under both of LGPL3 && GPL3 terms have to include both license header notice top of each file? Or just put GPL header notice? or simply put LGPL3 ...
13
votes
4answers
3k views

Does the LGPL allow me to do this?

I am planning to develop a commercial software using a LGPL software. In the LGPL software that I am using some functions in a class are not fully implemented. I want to modify the LGPL code so that ...
2
votes
1answer
112 views

Is it possible to release a library based on the ASIO SDK under the LGPLv3?

I'm wondering if it's possible to write and release a library based on the ASIO SDK under the LGPLv3. More specifically, the ASIO license says something I'm not sure how to interpret (2.2) : The ...
3
votes
2answers
157 views

Is it considered “conveying” if I share modified LGPL v3 code on GitHub?

It is critical to know what constitutes "conveying" under LGPL v3. I am considering creating some software based on LGPL v3. The software will be used to run a web application. Now I wonder whether ...
9
votes
2answers
1k views

What constitutes “distributing” for LGPL v3

I am considering basing some new software on a LGPL web application. I want to utilize this new software for creating one website for my employer, and we do not intend to sell or distribute the ...
0
votes
1answer
496 views

LGPL open source license

I have recently become curious about open source licenses. I have a question about the LGPL. I created a Java web project and built it as a WAR package. Can I add LGPL jars to this WAR file?
2
votes
4answers
2k views

Can I use GPL, LGPL, MPL licensed packages with my application and make it closed source?

I saw a company is using BusyBox and also using Gpl + Lgpl + Mpl packages on it, and then they have there own application running on it. Their application is a closed source package. You buy the ...
1
vote
2answers
563 views

How does the license work for the LGPL open source framework?

Without knowing anything I wrote a big application, almost 1 year coding. It does Video/Audio such as softphone for commercial use (we sell it). I used a framework which was licensed under the LGPL, ...
11
votes
2answers
1k views

What does “GPL with classpath exception” mean in practice?

Oracle seems to license all their Java-related open source code under the GPL with a classpath exception. From what I understand, this seems to allow to combine these libraries with your own code into ...
13
votes
1answer
2k views

Downsides of GNU LGPL v3 vs. GNU LGPL v2.1?

Firstly, I realize that this is a programming Q&A site, and not a place for legal advice.... Just trying to get a basic idea of what the downsides to using an LGPLv3 library might be. What ...
2
votes
1answer
304 views

Copyleft Licenses - Need to attribute?

I'm currently evaluating which license to use for my next OS project, and things are getting more and more interesting after I decided that I really want to understand what the licenses mean. Up ...
13
votes
11answers
1k views

Difference between free and open software? [duplicate]

Possible Duplicate: Open Source but not Free Software (or vice versa) I recently was at talk were Stallman was the keynote speaker, and he stated he hated the term open software, because it ...
3
votes
2answers
293 views

Is distributing patches in compliance with the GPL?

I'm designing a distro and some of the software packages included are maintained in such a way that my source repository doesn't actually include the source code, but they are included as an ...
0
votes
2answers
143 views

Questions about software licensing [duplicate]

I've been having a discussion about licensing and open source software. Basically - the other guy is saying that licensing is easy, if you're going to build a product you can use an (any) open source ...
2
votes
1answer
208 views

License for code snippets

I'm wondering if there is a common license that would be good for snippets of code (eg. things you might just paste into a file), which has the following conditions: Modifications of this snippet ...
2
votes
2answers
91 views

Options for software licensing for plugins?

I'm creating a software application where up until now, the majority of code and assets have been produced by me. There are smaller bits of code that I've taken from other places; these have all been ...
0
votes
3answers
188 views

License compatibility question

I have a question regarding software licenses. I plan to put a license to a framework that I have written. My intention is that the license should be open, in order to maintain a community. To be ...
6
votes
5answers
267 views

Can I use open source libraries in trialware?

I have written a small Java program which i'd like to distribute on my website. I have used a few external librarys which declare following licences: Apache License (2.0), LGPL and one API doesn't ...
11
votes
8answers
1k views

I created a program based on an LGPL project, and I'm not allowed to publish the source code

I thought LGPL was a permissive license, just like MIT, BSD or Apache. But today I read, that only linking to LGPL (libraries etc) is allowed from closed-source code - other than that, it's copyleft - ...