1
vote
1answer
172 views

Object-Oriented equivalent of LISP's progn function?

I'm currently writing a LISP parser that iterates through some AutoLISP code and does its best to make it a little easier to read (changing prefix notation to infix notation, changing setq assignments ...
1
vote
1answer
128 views

What is the most efficient method in converting AutoLISP legacy code to C#?

I am engaged in a project that works mainly in AutoCAD to design and manufacture prefabricated building components such as roofing trusses. One of our goals is to redesign a program that was written ...
31
votes
6answers
2k views

Does Lisp still have any special feature which has NOT been adopted by other programming languages?

Does Lisp still have any special feature which has NOT been adopted by other programming languages? By Lisp, I mean all the Lisp programming languages as a whole. I've been told how amazing Lisp is ...
9
votes
3answers
899 views

Is it possible to compile a higher level language to readable C++? [closed]

C++ is a great language in many ways, but some things in particular are cumbersome to write without an IDE. As a VIM user, it would be very interesting if I had access to a higher level language which ...
4
votes
1answer
326 views

s expression representation for c

Experimenting with various lisps lately (clojure especially) i have wondered if there are any s expression based representations of (subsets) of c, so you could use lisp/closure to write macros and ...
3
votes
3answers
375 views

Is there a way to use a higher level language in a competition that only has C, C++ and Java by default? [closed]

On that competition, you gain access to a system with gcc, vim, emacs and Java. You can't take any file with you and there's no internet access, but you can do whatever you want inside that system. ...
0
votes
2answers
249 views

Does syntax matters for a (Lispy) Domain Specific Language (MELT, inside GCC)?

I am the main author and designer of MELT, a domain specific language to extend GCC (the Gnu Compiler Collection). The implementation is available free software (GPLv3 licensed). If you want a ...
19
votes
6answers
2k views

Is there a language more general than Lisp? [closed]

I've been programming for a long time, and writing in Lisp (well, mostly Scheme) for a little less. My experience in these languages (and other functional languages) has informed my ability to write ...
19
votes
12answers
2k views

Is there a language offering LISP-like macros with a more complex syntax?

LISP's macros are extremely powerful constructs, and the inability to introspect and modify the program itself beyond the method signature level has always struck me as a limitation. Yet I favour ...
5
votes
2answers
332 views

Is the Lisp “family” of languages any more closely related than the “C-like-syntax” family?

I was recently thinking about the large variety of lisp languages, specifically the fact that while they all have similar syntax, and could all in theory be implemented from the same small set of ...
33
votes
11answers
4k views

Why isn't Lisp more widespread?

I am starting to learn Scheme by the SICP videos, and I would like to move to Common Lisp next. The language seems very interesting, and most of the people writings books on it advocate that it has ...
114
votes
18answers
44k views

Is LISP still useful in today's world? Which version is most used?

I try to teach myself a new programming language in regular intervals of time. Recently, I've read how Lisp and its dialects are at the complete opposite end of the spectrum from languages like C/C++, ...
25
votes
10answers
3k views

Would you use (a dialect of) LISP for a real-world application? Where and why?

LISP (and dialects such as Scheme, Common LISP and Clojure) haven't gained much industry support even though they are quite decent programming languages. (At the moment though it seems like they are ...