7
votes
4answers
701 views

What makes Common Lisp “big”?

I've been learning both Common Lisp and Racket, and one thing that I consistently hear is that Racket is a much "smaller" language than Common Lisp. I was wondering what this really meant. As far as I ...
5
votes
2answers
213 views

Can the Clojure set and maps syntax be added to other Lisp dialects?

In addition to create list using parentheses, Clojure allows to create vectors using [ ], maps using { } and sets using #{ }. Lisp is always said to be a very extensible language in which you can ...
0
votes
2answers
236 views

Does syntax matters for a (Lispy) Domain Specific Language (MELT, inside GCC)?

I am the main author and designer of MELT, a domain specific language to extend GCC (the Gnu Compiler Collection). The implementation is available free software (GPLv3 licensed). If you want a ...
18
votes
12answers
2k views

Is there a language offering LISP-like macros with a more complex syntax?

LISP's macros are extremely powerful constructs, and the inability to introspect and modify the program itself beyond the method signature level has always struck me as a limitation. Yet I favour ...