meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | London, United Kingdom | |
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 2 years, 3 months |
| seen | May 10 at 16:33 | |
| stats | profile views | 30 |
|
Feb 10 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
May 29 |
comment |
Should programming languages be strict or loose? It's not necessary to have object be a root of everything. You can have many fine types without having a hierarchy in every object. You could e.g. choose a type-class that has the largest number of methods attached to it based on type-inference. |
|
Feb 14 |
comment |
Interacting With Data Using Multiple Databases/Servers A single thread? How is it then a relevant benchmark? |
|
Feb 13 |
comment |
Sharding with IoC Improving fast: yeah, 7 years after the fact :) |
|
Feb 13 |
comment |
Sharding with IoC I can't prove the negation, but if you're happy with it, that's fine, good for you. IMO it sucks and I've had massive problems with it in projects :), not to mention its dependencies and lack of community. |
|
Feb 13 |
comment |
Sharding with IoC Well, it's not thread-safe nor has many features; features one needs after the initial meeting... |
|
Feb 12 |
comment |
Sharding with IoC No idea. I would avoid Unity if I could. |
|
Feb 12 |
answered | Interacting With Data Using Multiple Databases/Servers |
|
Feb 12 |
revised |
Interacting With Data Using Multiple Databases/Servers added 374 characters in body |
|
Feb 12 |
answered | Interacting With Data Using Multiple Databases/Servers |
|
Feb 12 |
answered | Sharding with IoC |
|
Feb 12 |
answered | What are the practical uses of Windows Services? |
|
Feb 10 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Dec 8 |
comment |
Is there a canonical book for SOA with .NET? Well, they are good at explaining WS--standards (albeit dry to read). Many systems run on those standards and many external API facades of businesses use them. However, they are glorified RPC protocols. SOA to me requires a looser coupling than WS- can provide, which I think comes from message-oriented architecture, rather than synchronous-request-response-based ones. I see a nice use-case for WS-Trust and WS-Federation + STSes though, so I'm not against all WS-*. |
|
Sep 24 |
comment |
Command handlers and DDD Yes, you execute the command but make sure that the command is not invalid both in the application layer and domain. |
|
Sep 23 |
comment |
Command handlers and DDD The validation that you seem to be describing doesn't seem to me to warrant modelling it with a 2-phase validation protocol - sure, validate the method invocation's parameters on the entity like you'd test in a unit test, but besides this; the application layer/GUI could easily validate the rules that you are describing without sending commands to the domain. Imo. Unless the client is malicious the command should then work. If the client is malicious then the command fails and your read model never gets a corresponding event and you can inspect the problematic command in error queue. |
|
Sep 21 |
answered | Command handlers and DDD |
|
Jun 30 |
awarded | Necromancer |
|
Feb 21 |
comment |
What to do if you find a vulnerability in a competitor's site? Yup: anonymous mail to seclists.org/fulldisclosure, he he he... ;) |
|
Feb 21 |
answered | Dependency analysis from C# code through to database tables/columns |
