Kevin

less info
meta site favicon meta user | stack exchange network profile network profile
290 reputation
17
bio website
location
age
visits member for 2 years, 2 months
seen May 14 at 20:28
stats profile views 9

20 Actions

suggestions reviews revisions comments badges posts accepts all
Nov
28
 comment CSS vs codebehind, if I have to do part of the style in codebehind, should I do all of it there?
This is actually what I ended up doing. Setting the width in the code and rest of styling in css with comments in both places explaining it
Nov
28
 accepted CSS vs codebehind, if I have to do part of the style in codebehind, should I do all of it there?
Nov
28
 awarded  Editor
Nov
28
 comment CSS vs codebehind, if I have to do part of the style in codebehind, should I do all of it there?
I mean just the styling for that one object, not the entire site. Added some clarificatio to the question
Nov
28
 revised CSS vs codebehind, if I have to do part of the style in codebehind, should I do all of it there?
clarification
Nov
28
 comment CSS vs codebehind, if I have to do part of the style in codebehind, should I do all of it there?
@gbjbaanb Yes, it is a bug in .Net
Nov
28
 asked CSS vs codebehind, if I have to do part of the style in codebehind, should I do all of it there?
Jul
31
 awarded  Critic
Apr
7
 awarded  Yearling
Oct
28
 awarded  Nice Answer
Apr
22
 comment Should you create a boolean function that does the opposite of an existing function just so its purpose is clear?
Don't know who down voted you or why, but you get an upvote from me. While it still doesn't seem to make sense to me, if it is common practice in the language you are using, then it would make sense to at least consider it for consistency's sake.
Apr
19
 awarded  Scholar
Apr
19
 accepted Should you create a boolean function that does the opposite of an existing function just so its purpose is clear?
Apr
19
 comment Should you create a boolean function that does the opposite of an existing function just so its purpose is clear?
I still don't see how !InSet is any less clear than NotInSet. Also, I've never used Ruby so I may be completely misreading this, but "unless NotInSet" seems much LESS clear than "if InSet"
Apr
15
 awarded  Student
Apr
15
 asked Should you create a boolean function that does the opposite of an existing function just so its purpose is clear?
Apr
7
 comment Stored Procedures a bad practice at one of worlds largest IT software consulting firms?
Maybe I'm missing something, but if you are going to have to change the stored procedures because of switching databases, are you going to have to change the code just as much if you don't use stored procedures?
Apr
7
 awarded  Supporter
Apr
7
 awarded  Teacher
Nov
26
 answered Best way to relate code smells to a non technical audience?