Reputation
20,200
Top tag
Next privilege 25,000 Rep.
Access to site analytics
Badges
9 75 135
Impact
~1.4m people reached

Jul
29
comment Default vs Impl when implementing interfaces in Java
@user61852 I think you are picking at semantics here. I'm talking about intended design and the eventual state, respectively to your complaints. No need to be pedantic; if this advice doesn't ring true for you, don't take it.
Jul
29
comment Default vs Impl when implementing interfaces in Java
@RenniePet Good point, thanks. I meant "implement", so I've corrected that and added an example.
Jul
29
revised Default vs Impl when implementing interfaces in Java
Explaining the last sentence better, I think.
Jul
26
awarded  Guru
Jul
25
awarded  Favorite Question
Jun
18
awarded  Good Question
Jun
13
awarded  Enlightened
Jun
13
awarded  Nice Answer
May
3
awarded  Popular Question
Apr
29
awarded  Famous Question
Apr
28
awarded  Nice Answer
Apr
15
awarded  Nice Answer
Apr
11
awarded  Nice Answer
Mar
25
awarded  Good Answer
Mar
21
awarded  Enlightened
Mar
21
awarded  Nice Answer
Mar
4
awarded  Good Answer
Feb
26
awarded  Constituent
Feb
26
comment Design Patterns for Javascript
@ErikReppen Thanks, and sorry, I may have been overly sensitive. I am quite experienced with JS, but your comment is fair. Having done quite a bit with Plain Old JS, I look for utilities that abstract the common motions, however, like everything it can be abused. The fact that it is created to act like other languages may encourage that abuse. I've seen organizations with large teams and lots of code go the class/module route, but I admit not without producing your readability complaint. And I can agree that composition is a good thing; would love to see that as an answer on this question.
Feb
19
awarded  Caucus