| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 2 years |
| seen | Feb 19 at 16:32 | |
| stats | profile views | 36 |
|
May 11 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Mar 5 |
awarded | Notable Question |
|
Oct 14 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
May 11 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Dec 29 |
comment |
Can PHP be used for desktop application development? Yup, I have tried it since then, but there are a lot of bugs and missing docs (no bashing of titanium intended, the eclipse-based IDE is very cool, but it still needs a lot). Air is proprietary and dev is hard under linux. I am exploring the possibility of building my own wrapper around webkit through QT. |
|
Dec 2 |
comment |
Functional Low-Level language that can use a webkit view @NicholasSmith: I know, but AFAIK, QT-Webkit makes your app much larger; besides, I don't really like the ethos/license of QT. Still an option though, I am considering it. |
|
Dec 2 |
comment |
Functional Low-Level language that can use a webkit view @Ryathal: this is exactly what I want, only two things; 1 - this has to work offline, 2 - I want to make use of local capabilities such as filesystem (there is a file browser in the app) |
|
Dec 2 |
comment |
Functional Low-Level language that can use a webkit view thing is most people don't really understand "prototype-based", plus I don't really care about the prototyping part, what I do care is that they are functional in the broad sense, like described here: stackoverflow.com/questions/3962604/…. I edited my question as per your suggestion nonetheless. |
|
Dec 2 |
revised |
Functional Low-Level language that can use a webkit view edited the references to "functional languages" as suggested |
|
Dec 2 |
revised |
Functional Low-Level language that can use a webkit view added links |
|
Dec 1 |
comment |
Functional Low-Level language that can use a webkit view I am not very strict on the meaning of functional language. What I mean is a language where functions are first-class citizens (like js). And this is not the titanium I mean. I will edit my question and add the correct links |
|
Dec 1 |
asked | Functional Low-Level language that can use a webkit view |
|
Nov 30 |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
Nov 27 |
comment |
Create my own database system I am following the steps you suggested. 1,2,3 are no problem. However, I am stumped by #4. In the case of large amounts of data, how would I load in memory only the relevant parts? I thought of storing everything as binary data and keep another index file, but what if the user is not querying by index? I still would have to loop through the whole file...I guess it's time for another question |
|
Nov 25 |
accepted | Local Stack vs Call Stack |
|
Nov 25 |
comment |
Create my own database system And for anyone coming here looking for the same answers: I find flockDB to be the best candidate to learn, the codebase is really small, the code very readable (although I don't speak scala) and easy to understand. |
|
Nov 25 |
comment |
Create my own database system Very nice indeed. I was on the verge of accepting this. I didn't because I thought yannis's answer to be more to the point, and more likely to help people having the same question. But this was definitely encouraging. Thanks a lot. |
|
Nov 25 |
accepted | Create my own database system |
|
Nov 25 |
comment |
Create my own database system This is super! Even more coming from you :) I'd like to accept almost each other answer but since I gotta pick one this has to be it. I'm expecting a comment with a link to your repository when you're done: most definitely! Thanks again, to you and everyone else, this was really uplifting. |
|
Nov 25 |
comment |
Create my own database system @YannisRizos Agreed. This was not my intention either. Sorry if I offended you and thanks for the severe but useful help & advice. |