Reputation
716
Top tag
Next privilege 1,000 Rep.
See votes, expandable usercard
Badges
6 14
Impact
~39k people reached

  • 0 posts edited
  • 0 helpful flags
  • 6 votes cast
Feb
6
comment Is C++11 Uniform Initialization a replacement for the old style syntax?
are you sure that 5.2 to float is narrowing? See open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html
Dec
5
comment Is `catch(…) { throw; }` a bad practice?
+ for the uncensored truth
Oct
30
comment Whats the difference between syntax and grammar?
@delnan. Not true. For example int; is grammatically valid, but syntactically ill-formed in C++. The grammar has no problem with this code, but syntax constraints require that a name is provided if the first part of a declaration contains no class-specifier or enum-specifier or, in C++11, friend-specifier.
Jun
11
comment Deprecation considered harmful?
@Neil now that you have adapted your question, I can adapt my answer :)
Mar
31
comment Interesting interview question
The vote count on the question and answers suggest this has been posted on reddit or something.
Mar
31
comment Interesting interview question
@Jon making a performance comparison if you allow the blocks to change N doesn't make sense. But if it's a trick question, they might want to hear an answer that exploits this one :)