| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | Minneapolis, MN | |
| age | 27 | |
| visits | member for | 1 year, 11 months |
| seen | Jan 29 at 18:33 | |
| stats | profile views | 178 |
I like to program, but am a noob, which is why I'm here.
<-My sexy fatbooth picture
|
Jun 23 |
accepted | How To Organize Factories in a .Net Project? |
|
Jun 23 |
accepted | Interested in Feedback on QA System Design |
|
Jun 23 |
asked | How Would You Design This Table? |
|
Jun 13 |
comment |
How To Organize Factories in a .Net Project? In your classes sub-directory, do you have separate sub-sub-directories for BLL and DAL layers? |
|
Jun 13 |
comment |
How To Organize Factories in a .Net Project? How would you organize your factories classes? All in one Factories.cs file? Or one file per factory class (that seems like a bit much...)? |
|
Jun 13 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Jun 13 |
revised |
How To Organize Factories in a .Net Project? added 208 characters in body |
|
Jun 13 |
asked | How To Organize Factories in a .Net Project? |
|
Jun 10 |
comment |
Use Dependency Injection For Data Objects? Sure, I mean just a class with no methods, a class that just stores data. If Data Object isn't the correct term for this, is there one, or is it just called a class with no methods? |
|
Jun 10 |
asked | Use Dependency Injection For Data Objects? |
|
Jun 10 |
comment |
GUI, BLL, DAL Organization In A Project Also, thanks for the tip about dependency injection. That is a new concept to me, and it seems to make good sense. I'll have to learn more about it :) |
|
Jun 10 |
comment |
GUI, BLL, DAL Organization In A Project So businessObject.PerformOperation() would looks something like: DataAccessObject.PerformOperation(), since an instance of DataAccessObject lives in businessObject? |
|
Jun 10 |
asked | GUI, BLL, DAL Organization In A Project |
|
Jun 7 |
comment |
Arguments for storing binary asociations in a single field vs. in a mapping table? I completely agree with you. The point of this thread is for me to gain more confidence in my belief in relational database design. It's something I want to push inside of my organization. |
|
Jun 7 |
awarded | Commentator |
|
Jun 7 |
comment |
Arguments for storing binary asociations in a single field vs. in a mapping table? @DeveloperArt, I will change my field naming conventions from now on. The more I think of it, the more I agree with you. |
|
Jun 7 |
comment |
Arguments for storing binary asociations in a single field vs. in a mapping table? @GrandmasterB, actually storing comma separated data |
|
Jun 7 |
comment |
Arguments for storing binary asociations in a single field vs. in a mapping table? About the prefix, noted, I will change my naming conventions from now on, it seems other members agree with this point also (the more I think of it the more it makes sense too). |
|
Jun 7 |
comment |
Arguments for storing binary asociations in a single field vs. in a mapping table? These are interesting special cases, thanks for posting, I will remember these. |
|
Jun 7 |
comment |
Arguments for storing binary asociations in a single field vs. in a mapping table? I agree that that is a false economy, what can I say in response to someone who suggests using the second method in order to reduce the number of tables? |