473 reputation
110
bio website
location Minneapolis, MN
age 27
visits member for 1 year, 11 months
seen Jan 29 at 18:33
stats profile views 178

I like to program, but am a noob, which is why I'm here.
<-My sexy fatbooth picture


Jun
23
accepted How To Organize Factories in a .Net Project?
Jun
23
accepted Interested in Feedback on QA System Design
Jun
23
asked How Would You Design This Table?
Jun
13
comment How To Organize Factories in a .Net Project?
In your classes sub-directory, do you have separate sub-sub-directories for BLL and DAL layers?
Jun
13
comment How To Organize Factories in a .Net Project?
How would you organize your factories classes? All in one Factories.cs file? Or one file per factory class (that seems like a bit much...)?
Jun
13
awarded  Editor
Jun
13
revised How To Organize Factories in a .Net Project?
added 208 characters in body
Jun
13
asked How To Organize Factories in a .Net Project?
Jun
10
comment Use Dependency Injection For Data Objects?
Sure, I mean just a class with no methods, a class that just stores data. If Data Object isn't the correct term for this, is there one, or is it just called a class with no methods?
Jun
10
asked Use Dependency Injection For Data Objects?
Jun
10
comment GUI, BLL, DAL Organization In A Project
Also, thanks for the tip about dependency injection. That is a new concept to me, and it seems to make good sense. I'll have to learn more about it :)
Jun
10
comment GUI, BLL, DAL Organization In A Project
So businessObject.PerformOperation() would looks something like: DataAccessObject.PerformOperation(), since an instance of DataAccessObject lives in businessObject?
Jun
10
asked GUI, BLL, DAL Organization In A Project
Jun
7
comment Arguments for storing binary asociations in a single field vs. in a mapping table?
I completely agree with you. The point of this thread is for me to gain more confidence in my belief in relational database design. It's something I want to push inside of my organization.
Jun
7
awarded  Commentator
Jun
7
comment Arguments for storing binary asociations in a single field vs. in a mapping table?
@DeveloperArt, I will change my field naming conventions from now on. The more I think of it, the more I agree with you.
Jun
7
comment Arguments for storing binary asociations in a single field vs. in a mapping table?
@GrandmasterB, actually storing comma separated data
Jun
7
comment Arguments for storing binary asociations in a single field vs. in a mapping table?
About the prefix, noted, I will change my naming conventions from now on, it seems other members agree with this point also (the more I think of it the more it makes sense too).
Jun
7
comment Arguments for storing binary asociations in a single field vs. in a mapping table?
These are interesting special cases, thanks for posting, I will remember these.
Jun
7
comment Arguments for storing binary asociations in a single field vs. in a mapping table?
I agree that that is a false economy, what can I say in response to someone who suggests using the second method in order to reduce the number of tables?