network profile
| bio | website | ustimen.co |
|---|---|---|
| location | Novosibirsk, Russia | |
| age | 30 | |
| visits | member for | 1 year, 11 months |
| seen | May 29 at 6:31 | |
| stats | profile views | 8 |
Web-developer
|
Feb 26 |
awarded | Caucus |
|
Jan 13 |
awarded | Autobiographer |
|
Oct 16 |
comment |
Is a code review which uses only code comments a good idea? @JohannesS. which vcs do you using? Also do you have some ready howto or wiki about their integration? Nice to have such one. |
|
Oct 7 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Oct 7 |
accepted | Is a code review which uses only code comments a good idea? |
|
Oct 5 |
comment |
Is a code review which uses only code comments a good idea? @AndrewFinnell, this form, and forms like this is that's why I dont' like complex solutions :( my.atlassian.com/ondemand/signup/jira,fisheye And there are just no crucible! :) $('.submit-form input').length == 58 |
|
Oct 5 |
comment |
Is a code review which uses only code comments a good idea? @AndrewFinnell, ... doesn't "$10/MO" means that it's 10$ per month? Or I looking for in wrong place? |
|
Oct 5 |
comment |
Is a code review which uses only code comments a good idea? "gerrit" I installed it -- it wasnt so hard. I just fail to use it! And also it has ugly UI and workflow. |
|
Oct 5 |
comment |
Is a code review which uses only code comments a good idea? wow! We need to try it instead of our lovely redmine. |
|
Oct 5 |
comment |
Is a code review which uses only code comments a good idea? @AndrewFinnell, it's $10 per month :) atlassian.com/software/crucible/pricing But main bad thing is that it can have dependency on jira. |
|
Oct 4 |
comment |
Is a code review which uses only code comments a good idea? @KonradRudolph, by minizing I means to minize interactions, that break developer`s concentration. For example: do you like, when you do some complex thing and someone asks you about not-so-critical now? After you need to "reboot" yuorself into complex task again. I dont' mean we should work as in jail here :) |
|
Oct 4 |
comment |
Is a code review which uses only code comments a good idea? "keeping a record" -- only when we not squashing review commits ... But then we meet with a "review-chat" in version control system... Those who likes squashing and "clean history" will not be very glad. |
|
Oct 4 |
comment |
Is a code review which uses only code comments a good idea? "person can ... delete the comment" -- it's an issue. +1 |
|
Oct 4 |
comment |
Is a code review which uses only code comments a good idea? "interactivity" -- author can answer in another comments, below initial. Just like in wikipedia style. |
|
Oct 4 |
comment |
Is a code review which uses only code comments a good idea? "place for praise" -- also possible, but after squashing will be lost :( I already see one issue -- we lost review history when squashing commits. |
|
Oct 4 |
comment |
Is a code review which uses only code comments a good idea? "compactness" -- I think it could be done by one comment like "// REV Dude, we have 37 places where pointers were not checked first, including this one. Please RTFM" |
|
Oct 4 |
comment |
Is a code review which uses only code comments a good idea? then we need some good code-review tool. Our current described approach is mostly political as people should invent some ethiquet and follow it. |
|
Oct 4 |
awarded | Commentator |
|
Oct 4 |
comment |
Is a code review which uses only code comments a good idea? @KonradRudolph, we should minimize the interaction and interact only when it really needs. Same as in "normal" code review tools: reviewee doesn't need to be in "chat" with reviewer in same time frame. Insted we can do another features and answer in convonient time. |
|
Oct 4 |
comment |
Is a code review which uses only code comments a good idea? @DocBrown, "face-to-face" is much better. But face-to-face is not good, when we need to give reviewee "isolation" to work on another feauture. Something like why emails are better than phonecalls -- you can manage your time and concentrate better. |
