| bio | website | linkedin.com/pub/… |
|---|---|---|
| location | Italy | |
| age | 32 | |
| visits | member for | 1 year, 9 months |
| seen | May 14 at 14:11 | |
| stats | profile views | 3 |
I am a developer: I love to code! Particular areas of interest:
- C#: with its mixed OO and functional concepts, it is a joy to code
- Windows internals...
- ...and linked to that, debugging! At any level
- Programming languages specifics
- Low-level programming (C/C++), especially in Windows
- LINQ
- Runtime code generation and manipulation (IL, dynamic LINQ, Reflection.Emit...)
- Concurrency in .NET: TPL, DataFlow, Agents...
- ASP.NET (especially MVC)
- WPF/Silverlight
In my spare time, I like to spend time with my wife and family, take pictures with my Nikon, and fix my old BMW
|
May 13 |
awarded | Autobiographer |
|
Mar 7 |
awarded | Critic |
|
Mar 30 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Mar 30 |
accepted | Design in “mixed” languages: object oriented design or functional programming? |
|
Mar 29 |
comment |
Design in “mixed” languages: object oriented design or functional programming? I agree and have the same feeling.But I was sort of "cheating" with my functional code: in my case is all what I need, but what if I need to add and remove "observers"? I edited my question |
|
Mar 29 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Mar 29 |
comment |
Design in “mixed” languages: object oriented design or functional programming? I agree and have the same feeling. |
|
Mar 29 |
revised |
Design in “mixed” languages: object oriented design or functional programming? Added consideration |
|
Mar 29 |
comment |
Design in “mixed” languages: object oriented design or functional programming? @DPD for example, I have used it to overcome the lack of multiple dispatch. In many cases, pattern matching and case classes/discriminated unions make code cleaner then using the Visitor pattern. See for example lorgonblog.wordpress.com/2008/04/09/catamorphisms-part-three |
|
Mar 29 |
comment |
Design in “mixed” languages: object oriented design or functional programming? @SK-logic I love functional programming, especially OCaml. But I am more interested in multi-paradigm languages, and in a comparison of approaches (when do you use a paradigm?). Basides, I do not work alone, so while I can use F# or Scala and still have happy co-workers using C# and Java, I cannot dump classes ;) |
|
Mar 29 |
comment |
Design in “mixed” languages: object oriented design or functional programming? @Antoras If you could a comparison with an approach based on Actors, it would be more then welcome :) |
|
Mar 29 |
awarded | Student |
|
Mar 29 |
comment |
Design in “mixed” languages: object oriented design or functional programming? Also, I am not concerned with the code: however, I would like to confront with fellow programmers on the approach (to my understanding, this is what programmers.se is for, otherwise I would have posted my Q on SO) |
|
Mar 29 |
comment |
Design in “mixed” languages: object oriented design or functional programming? "You can, with a lot of care, write an entire program containing objects which have no state, mimicking FP.", of course, and through discipline you can do the same in imperative languages too. :) In general, I do not think at design patters as something to make up for limitations, but consider the case of the Visitor pattern.. |
|
Mar 29 |
asked | Design in “mixed” languages: object oriented design or functional programming? |
|
Oct 7 |
awarded | Supporter |