meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 8 months |
| seen | 15 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 191 |
|
1d |
awarded | Nice Answer |
|
1d |
revised |
How to sync clocks over networking for game development? include SO_TIMESTAMP as suggested in comment above |
|
2d |
answered | How to sync clocks over networking for game development? |
|
2d |
comment |
How to sync clocks over networking for game development? @CongXu: I am not so sure. While this is task usually done for games, it is not inherently specific to game development. Many other distributed systems need synchronized clock. |
|
Jun 13 |
awarded | Custodian |
|
Jun 13 |
reviewed | Close What is the typical growth rate of a new long tail website? |
|
Jun 13 |
answered | How to solve the problem of nested comments |
|
Jun 12 |
comment |
centos 6.2 can not load my shared library If it works under root and not under normal user, it will probably be permissions, no? |
|
Jun 12 |
awarded | Custodian |
|
Jun 12 |
reviewed | Reject suggested edit on How to use Visual Studio for c++ programming |
|
Jun 10 |
comment |
How would I make a compiler in C++? There are many stages to a compilation toolchain. Parser, code generator, optimizer, assembler and linker. While simple parser + code generator (compiler) without optimization for simple language is not very hard, the whole chain is a lot of work and each step is it's own kettle of fish. You need to choose which one you want to do, but you should use existing components for the rest (assembler and linker are independent on the language you compile). |
|
Jun 5 |
answered | Is there any common naming convention for git commit summary? |
|
Jun 5 |
comment |
GPLv3 Software vs. BSD (3-Clause) OpenSource Project .. i don't get it @DerDu: Yes. That would be permitted by the licenses. |
|
Jun 5 |
comment |
GPLv3 Software vs. BSD (3-Clause) OpenSource Project .. i don't get it @DerDu: Yes. In this case your code is not covered by GPL. You still have to satisfy GPL for the relevant part if you ship it in any way (including on-demand), but it does not affect your own code. On a side-note, meaning of "linking" is not clearly defined for interpreted languages like PHP, but including it would probably be considered linking. |
|
Jun 5 |
comment |
GPLv3 Software vs. BSD (3-Clause) OpenSource Project .. i don't get it @DerDu: If you make the GPL extension a plugin, you can be sure the rest of the main program is not covered. |
|
Jun 5 |
revised |
GPLv3 Software vs. BSD (3-Clause) OpenSource Project .. i don't get it added 12 characters in body |
|
Jun 5 |
comment |
GPLv3 Software vs. BSD (3-Clause) OpenSource Project .. i don't get it @DerDu: You don't need that workaround and it does not change anything anyway. Distribution in source form is not affected and for distribution of binary form what makes your code a derived work is linking it to the GPL code. If it is linked, it is covered by GPL, if it is not and only runs the GPL code as separate executable, it is not covered. |
|
Jun 5 |
answered | GPLv3 Software vs. BSD (3-Clause) OpenSource Project .. i don't get it |
|
Jun 3 |
revised |
How to write integration tests for a component oriented software platform added 109 characters in body |
|
Jun 3 |
comment |
How to write integration tests for a component oriented software platform @Yggdrasil: I'd start with the realistic configuration and progressively reduce the scope around the components that show problems. The realistic configuration is just one or few setups and it will show you which are the most problematic bits quickly. |
