meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 5 months |
| seen | 5 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 15 |
|
May 16 |
answered | Best Practice for Argument Checking |
|
May 14 |
comment |
Your opinion about JavaEE learning project Do you have a personal website ? a blog ? if no you may choose to write one using JEE stack. At least i may be helpful |
|
Apr 22 |
awarded | Nice Answer |
|
Mar 20 |
comment |
What problems can be solved using Generics? just think of generic collections ! It may be a good example |
|
Mar 1 |
comment |
Should the variable be named Id or ID? If using camelcase convention, it should definitely be xxId |
|
Mar 1 |
awarded | Constituent |
|
Mar 1 |
awarded | Caucus |
|
Jan 3 |
comment |
Best Practice to Avoid “Playing Telephone” with Constructor Arguments Ok, thanks for the info. But my concern was primarilly checking values in intensive loops (if x < 0 then what). |
|
Jan 2 |
comment |
Best Practice to Avoid “Playing Telephone” with Constructor Arguments Note that when working with graphics performance may be a prime feature, thus checking parameters or instantiating new objects in intensive loops may cause significant performance loss. |
|
Dec 21 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Nov 26 |
comment |
Naming convention: field starting with “m” or “s” Android dudes did really wrong in some aspects of their API, too much non standard java and outdated practices ... |
|
Nov 22 |
comment |
Is it time to deprecate synchronized, wait and notify? synchronized keyword may be usefull with simple static methods that should be thread safe, for anything else i would use concurrent. But this is my opinion |
|
Nov 21 |
comment |
If you should only have one assertion per test; how to test multiple inputs? In java with testng you have @DataProvider methods |
|
Nov 21 |
comment |
If you should only have one assertion per test; how to test multiple inputs? The best way to do so is using parameters (some framework support this feature, all frameworks should). This way you are testing a single behaviour but taking into account many test cases and still can see what parameter values caused an error if an error occurs |
|
Oct 31 |
comment |
Supporting early versions of Android Yes API 9 is the min sdk version in our product, it is a good compromise |
|
Oct 29 |
comment |
Where should I draw the line between unit tests and integration tests? Should they be separate? Integration test involves testing of more than one actual implementations of your components together (actual implementations means no mocks). |
|
Oct 26 |
comment |
Is it OK to have multiple asserts in a single unit test? When you do that you you should better using testing frameworks with dependant tests, it is better (e.g. testng supports this feature) |
|
Oct 22 |
comment |
Do unit tests sometimes break encapsulation? I dont agree, private stuff is private, taking them into account makes your tests very dependant on implementation. However it makes sense testing protected and package methods (package visibility is a java term). |
|
Oct 8 |
comment |
Does it make a difference if I declare variables inside or outside a loop in Java? In this case obviously there is performance and memory penalty. But it is not quite the case in the op's question |
|
Oct 8 |
answered | Does it make a difference if I declare variables inside or outside a loop in Java? |
