Reputation
1,207
Top tag
Next privilege 2,000 Rep.
Edit questions and answers
Badges
2 9 23
Impact
~71k people reached

Feb
24
revised Why are scientific programming languages so weird?
added 547 characters in body
Feb
24
comment Why are scientific programming languages so weird?
@okiharaherbst These old languages were different, because the programmers in 50-60-ties and up from 70-ties were/are different. Then programming was art and now it is an industry.
Feb
24
revised Why are scientific programming languages so weird?
added 219 characters in body
Feb
24
comment Why are scientific programming languages so weird?
@StevenBurnap I see. I only wanted to recall that all of them, including Pascal, come from Simula. Simula was the first OOP language. And had features that were hardly realized in all its children. Some of these old languages were fantastic.
Feb
23
comment Why are scientific programming languages so weird?
@StevenBurnap Pascal is a derivative of Simula, not vice versa.
Feb
23
comment Why are scientific programming languages so weird?
@phresnel "Not even maths uses = for assignment" - correct. "maths has no assignment" - correct for secondary school maths only.
Feb
23
awarded  Nice Answer
Feb
22
answered In what programming language did “let” first appear?
Feb
22
comment In what programming language did “let” first appear?
Assembler uses MOV instead of LET from 1954. Isn't it enough?
Feb
22
revised Is Lisp the first language to adopt structured programming?
added 1 characters in body
Feb
22
comment Why are scientific programming languages so weird?
@RobbieDee It was popular because of its lower level/ easy realization, and in spite of it, the level of universality that was ENOUGH for these times. Then there were enough languages that were more powerful, but they were hard or almost impossible to realize wholely.
Feb
21
comment Why are scientific programming languages so weird?
@RobbieDee And C was done later, than APL, SNOBOL, PL/I, simula, Smalltalk. And it is absolutely primitive in comparison with them.
Feb
21
comment My boss decided to add a “person to blame” field to every bug report. How can I convince him that it's a bad idea?
That sort of people take politeness and sensibility for weakness. The next time he'll come with something much worse. And will be even less eager to listen to opinions. Even now he says that hurting people is fun. If you'll work together with such people you'll have to become a sadist, too, or a masochist.
Feb
21
comment My boss decided to add a “person to blame” field to every bug report. How can I convince him that it's a bad idea?
@hasanyasin But what to do if the boss himself admits that hurting people is fun? I am afraid, that for this very guy any logic argumentation won't work. He is simply a sadist.
Feb
21
comment Why are scientific programming languages so weird?
@RobbieDee For me Assembler, autocode and machine code are not languages, sorry.
Feb
21
comment My boss decided to add a “person to blame” field to every bug report. How can I convince him that it's a bad idea?
@hasanyasin About bug's goodness - It is excellent! I am sad I can't put two upvotes! I'll use it myself, too!
Feb
21
comment My boss decided to add a “person to blame” field to every bug report. How can I convince him that it's a bad idea?
@poolie He has his fun hurting people... I don't think that it has sense to solve any problems with a practicing sadist apart from the dialogue between doctor and patient behind well-holstered doors. He won't understand any logic.
Feb
21
comment Why are scientific programming languages so weird?
@RobbieDee 1. I don't think it was the main reason. But I thing it was a thought at the back. 2. Which languages are lower level than C, sorry? Only don't mention Assembler - it is not a real language, for it substitutes lines to commands 1:1.
Feb
21
revised Why are scientific programming languages so weird?
added 68 characters in body
Feb
21
comment Why are scientific programming languages so weird?
@JohnR.Strohm Yes, of course. I have too shortened the sentence. Sorry.