network profile
| bio | website | advogato.org/person/redi |
|---|---|---|
| location | London, United Kingdom | |
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 1 month |
| seen | Mar 11 at 0:02 | |
| stats | profile views | 7 |
You might remember me from such films as the GNU C++ Standard Library (libstdc++), ACCU, the BSI C++ panel and ISO C++.
|
Dec 20 |
comment |
Does auto make C++ code harder to understand? @PlasmaHH I disagree, for (auto& item : items) is often still an advantage over explicitly naming the element type |
|
Dec 20 |
comment |
Does auto make C++ code harder to understand? So don't write auto x = GetX();, pick a better name than x that actually tells you what it does in that specific context ... that's often more useful than its type anyway. |
|
Dec 20 |
comment |
Does auto make C++ code harder to understand? @PlasmaHH, not all loops with iterators can be replace with range-based for e.g. if iterators are invalidated in the loop body and so need to be pre-incremented or not incremented at all. |
|
May 20 |
comment |
Would “Efficient C++” book be irrelevant now due to compiler improvements? Maybe not as directly, but Meyers is very concerned about performance (as you'll know if you've seen his talks about cache effects) and his tips almost always lead to clearer, more maintainable and faster code. |
|
May 20 |
awarded | Supporter |
