network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 11 months |
| seen | yesterday | |
| stats | profile views | 17 |
|
May 15 |
comment |
How do the Application and Database Interface Layers interact at their boundary? OK that makes sense to me, too. But how/who populates this Order Gateway Implementation? Is it a DAO or a DTO, both, or neither? |
|
May 5 |
awarded | Nice Answer |
|
May 2 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Apr 4 |
comment |
What are the practical benefits of LISP like syntax which Clojure uses over Java like syntax of Scala? You can partition the side-effect code in Java, but it's not very idiomatic. |
|
Mar 29 |
asked | How do the Application and Database Interface Layers interact at their boundary? |
|
Mar 26 |
comment |
The problems with Avoiding Smurf Naming classes with namespaces It's a code smell to name a class XService, XManager, etc. These don't mean anything. It's like a Util. If you're skimming the file names anything could be in there or missing from there. There's no way to know unless you look inside. I'd rename it from SmurfService to something else completely. |
|
Mar 25 |
comment |
Keep a programming language backwards compatible vs. fixing its flaws I don't know if I should post this as a separate question or as a comment. But why couldn't they make a programming language that elevates code migration to a first class concept? In java, there's a @Deprecated annotation that just gives you a warning. Maybe another language could actually provide a macro that replaces the old code with the correct new code. If you're using the latest version it's an error to call the deprecated code, but old code gets converted to use non-deprecated new code. Just spitballin' |
|
Mar 21 |
answered | Is there a reason that tests aren't written inline with the code that they test? |
|
Mar 21 |
comment |
In TDD, if I write a test case that passes without modifying production code, what does that mean? @AnthonyPegram Yes, but that's hindsight and because example is so simple. What if you didn't know? |
|
Mar 21 |
comment |
In TDD, if I write a test case that passes without modifying production code, what does that mean? @AnthonyPegram: Yes that makes sense. Of course pointing it out ruins the answer re: my OP. You wouldn't have written a test case that passed immediately. Would it be "wrong" to write TestAddMethod3 that Assert.IsTrue(Add(6,6) == 12);? |
|
Mar 20 |
asked | In TDD, if I write a test case that passes without modifying production code, what does that mean? |
|
Mar 9 |
comment |
Can I start with a passing unit test? TDD is so unintuitive I want to make sure I'm strictly following the practice before I decide if the practice is worth following. If I took the attitude of, "This seems silly and I probably don't need to worry about it" I wouldn't have attempted TDD in the first place. Even if I never strictly practice TDD, I think there's a lot of value in knowing how to strictly practice it. |
|
Mar 9 |
accepted | Can I start with a passing unit test? |
|
Mar 9 |
comment |
Can I start with a passing unit test? @JeroenVannevel OK, but after the first test makes me change that exception to a return null;, if I write 2-3 more tests after that that also assert null, am I doing something wrong? |
|
Mar 9 |
comment |
Can I start with a passing unit test? It's not about want, I just happened to write a few tests that say, "given...when...then return null" and my production code implementation returns null. My ide creates blank impls with return null; as a stub for me. |
|
Mar 9 |
comment |
Can I start with a passing unit test? Won't I be showing that when I write the first test that fails without changing the impl? |
|
Mar 9 |
asked | Can I start with a passing unit test? |
|
Mar 5 |
answered | Should I test inherited methods? |
|
Feb 26 |
answered | Is there an idiom for a loop that executes some block of instructions between iterations? (In Ruby in particular) |
|
Feb 26 |
comment |
Is there an idiom for a loop that executes some block of instructions between iterations? (In Ruby in particular) In haskell, I believe this is called a fold |
