| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 6 months |
| seen | May 17 at 12:45 | |
| stats | profile views | 13 |
|
Mar 21 |
comment |
Managing an undercover SVN repository @R0MANARMY : it is mainly a safety net. I want to be able to revert some intermediate step if something goes wrong. Anyway, I think I will try the git-svn-worflow mentionned by MichaelT |
|
Mar 20 |
asked | Managing an undercover SVN repository |
|
Nov 1 |
comment |
Can interface be not abstract? No, it's the other way around : not every abstract class is an interface. |
|
Nov 1 |
comment |
Is there a limit on the number of threads that can be spawned simultaneously? ok, so it is better to do everything in a single background process, with good exception handling/testing ? Is that how anti-viruses do when scanning hard drive for malvare/spyware/etc ? |
|
Nov 1 |
accepted | Is there a limit on the number of threads that can be spawned simultaneously? |
|
Nov 1 |
asked | Is there a limit on the number of threads that can be spawned simultaneously? |
|
Oct 29 |
awarded | Student |
|
Oct 29 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Oct 29 |
accepted | Application of LGPL license on a simple algorithm |
|
Oct 29 |
comment |
Application of LGPL license on a simple algorithm Oh I didn't know such notion existed ! |
|
Oct 29 |
comment |
Application of LGPL license on a simple algorithm It's actually the other way around ! I've implementing the algorithm from scratch using the obvious way as you said, and I noticed same somebody has already licensed it under LGPL ( the licensed implementation does not add any improvement from the basic method IMHO). |
|
Oct 29 |
asked | Application of LGPL license on a simple algorithm |
|
Oct 26 |
awarded | Supporter |