meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | Russia | |
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 2 years, 6 months |
| seen | May 5 at 13:42 | |
| stats | profile views | 26 |
This page intentionally left blank.
|
Mar 24 |
comment |
C++ why & how are virtual functions slower?-0x8(%rbp). oh my... that AT&T syntax. |
|
Mar 2 |
comment |
Why is it not possible to break out of an if statement? there is no such thing as C/C++. |
|
Feb 20 |
awarded | Caucus |
|
Nov 7 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Nov 7 |
answered | Stored procedure Naming conventions? |
|
Oct 21 |
answered | Dropbox as a Version Control tool |
|
Sep 27 |
comment |
Using T[1] instead of T for functions overloaded for T(&)[N] @James it's just an old, ugly, unsafe, redundant C code. |
|
Sep 26 |
revised |
Using T[1] instead of T for functions overloaded for T(&)[N] added 216 characters in body |
|
Sep 26 |
revised |
Using T[1] instead of T for functions overloaded for T(&)[N] added 21 characters in body |
|
Sep 26 |
asked | Using T[1] instead of T for functions overloaded for T(&)[N] |
|
Jun 8 |
comment |
C++ and system exceptionsthrow() works in run-time, so it's not an issue. nothrow works in compile-time, so yes, with hardware exceptions we can't use it. Regarding to complexity, just imagine that x->y works as x ? x->y : throw_null_pointer_dereference() |
|
Apr 20 |
comment |
When should you use bools in C++? It's not about "know when to use bool", it's about why do we have different names for similar types (like length_t) and why it's important that compiler checks types. |
|
Apr 13 |
comment |
What's the difference between recursion and corecursion? @HighPerformanceMark, it doesn't explain what corecursion is, we need another question |
|
Apr 5 |
comment |
Intel mnemonic to machine code converter library @Frederick, DLL? You can try Wine. |
|
Apr 5 |
comment |
Function parameter names @Vic, I don't think it's such a big deal. The first parameter have a decent name, so the second could be named so poorly just by occasion. |
|
Apr 5 |
answered | Function parameter names |
|
Apr 5 |
answered | Intel mnemonic to machine code converter library |
|
Apr 5 |
comment |
Command-Query-Separation and multithreading safe interfaces @TobiasLangner, no, you still don't get the point. There is StackAndLock which contains actual stack object, and ThreadSafeStack which provides thread-safe access to that stack. Thus, different threads access one shared Stack object via their local ThreadSafeStack objects. |
|
Apr 4 |
comment |
Command-Query-Separation and multithreading safe interfaces who is that "someone else"? please read it again, every thread has its own ThreadSafeStack, it's not shared across multiple threads. |
|
Apr 3 |
answered | Command-Query-Separation and multithreading safe interfaces |
