214 reputation
16
bio website
location
age
visits member for 2 years, 2 months
seen 7 hours ago

7h
comment What kinds of Open-Source licenses are NOT OK to use internally in a corporation?
@Brandin, I think we're only talking about libraries here, not tools. Maybe that will help reconcile the discussion. Tools aren't going to be distributed. I'm willing to make that assumption.
7h
comment What kinds of Open-Source licenses are NOT OK to use internally in a corporation?
@cpast, you are absolutely correct in what you say. But what I've learned from this question is that if what is internal today ever becomes external, then you run into a problem, right? So I need to at least be aware of that and think about the odds of that happening. At best I could have a contingency plan to replace that library with a commercial product in that event. I guess that would depend on the company and the app (is it potentially sellable). Business folks, like lawyers, can occasionally shock me with how different their thought process is from mine.
7h
comment What kinds of Open-Source licenses are NOT OK to use internally in a corporation?
@Brandin, well, a few folks here seem to think it's a problem, but if I find a cool library that is GPL, I can use Linux to argue to be able to use it. So, thanks :)
8h
revised What kinds of Open-Source licenses are NOT OK to use internally in a corporation?
added 108 characters in body
8h
comment What kinds of Open-Source licenses are NOT OK to use internally in a corporation?
@Brandin, also see the answer here, which goes into how a GPL can be problematic even internally (now I sound like a lawyer lol). Not to mention the scenario where internal becomes external. I know, I so wish GPL and actually anything was OK. Taint so. :(
8h
comment What kinds of Open-Source licenses are NOT OK to use internally in a corporation?
@Brandin, what specifically do you mean by "contribute" (pay, improve the code, post boilerplate)? Anyway, the problem is that any "common sense" I think I have when it comes to interpreting "terms" goes out the window in a legal arena where "common sense" as we know it is set aside completely and is replaced by whatever lawyers abide by (I've been in divorce court; trust me, I know). Using any kind of license, short / long, without first consulting war veterans who may have learned the hard way (or just through being smart), would be a reckless thing for me to do.
9h
revised What kinds of Open-Source licenses are NOT OK to use internally in a corporation?
added 96 characters in body
16h
awarded  Yearling
1d
accepted What kinds of Open-Source licenses are NOT OK to use internally in a corporation?
1d
comment What kinds of Open-Source licenses are NOT OK to use internally in a corporation?
I only found 3 distinct licenses among my libraries (see edit). Any specific thoughts about those? And then I'll mark as answer. Thanks Robert!
1d
revised What kinds of Open-Source licenses are NOT OK to use internally in a corporation?
added 141 characters in body
1d
comment What kinds of Open-Source licenses are NOT OK to use internally in a corporation?
@MasonWheeler, GPL bad. MPL good. Got it. Thanks.
1d
asked What kinds of Open-Source licenses are NOT OK to use internally in a corporation?
2d
comment I have one afternoon to extol the benefits of .NET over VB6… what do I say?
It's 3 years later, I'm just following up. I asked the same question and was advised on here just to leave the company (b/c they are not going to change). 6 months later, I did just that (b/c sure enough, they weren't ever going to change). I consider it a smart move. Did you quit?
Mar
20
accepted Filling the gap between Conception and Unit Test
Mar
20
comment Filling the gap between Conception and Unit Test
are you a .net developer? if i post a question on "software recommendations" will you answer it over there? I'm stuck without ~a way of doing it~. Thanks.
Mar
20
comment Filling the gap between Conception and Unit Test
Sounds like you know your process and you don't get stuck between concept and unit test. Would you mind sketching the flow in terms of tools / artifacts (in the .Net stack if possible). (e.g., "I use accept stories in Accept3000, which automatically create system tests in SuperSystemTesterNet, then for each one I ..., which integrates into NUnit tests")
Mar
20
comment Filling the gap between Conception and Unit Test
Boromir agrees.
Mar
20
revised Filling the gap between Conception and Unit Test
added 97 characters in body
Mar
19
comment Filling the gap between Conception and Unit Test
Thanks for your edit. Ok, since this is a solo project done from home while I am unemployed, I am both the customer and the developer. There is no one else to go get clarification from. I did a use case, and that was helpful to get more clear. So you think you can jump right from a Use Case to a Unit Test? That still seems like pretty big jump to me. Use Case doesn't say how it's done, but Unit Tests expects the developer to have already come up with the "How" before starting to write the test. How can I get to know how the feature works, is another way of putting it.