5,850 reputation
1328
bio website
location
age
visits member for 4 years
seen Dec 19 at 15:20

Mar
30
comment Software updating solution for both Linux/Windows platform
@david: It's pretty much the same with Windows: they use WSUS for OS and MS products, and then GPO's coupled with file shares for the rest.
Mar
30
comment Do you care if the person you're interviewing owns or contributes to Open Source projects?
@michael: David is 100% correct. I've had people tell me that they didn't feel like they could hire me because they were worried I was some kind of OSS mole, and I was out to steal and opensource their code, or that the "viral GPL" was going to be used by OSS lawyers to force them to reveal their codebase. It's all BS of course, but if they believe it, there is pretty much no way to convince them otherwise in an interview setting.
Mar
30
comment What are some easter eggs that went wrong?
@chuck: Yes and no. They chickened out before the final build, but they left the code in. A tiny tweak with an editor, and the whole thing was available.
Mar
29
comment What are some easter eggs that went wrong?
@nlawalker: I wondered myself. Still, it's a feature that was in the game, which could be enabled with a minimal amount of effort.
Mar
24
comment Turn away a bug if no reproducible test case exists?
@seansilver: If it's a real bug, it'll turn up again. Otherwise, if you can't narrow it down, you're going to be running in circles.
Mar
24
comment Turn away a bug if no reproducible test case exists?
+1: I don't know how these other people fix things...
Mar
24
comment Turn away a bug if no reproducible test case exists?
Seriously? "I had a bug, and I can't replicate it! Fix it!!!" And your response is to do...what? If it can't be replicated, by the customer or the programming staff, how can it be fixed?
Mar
24
comment Why bother with detailed specs?
@nikie: I'm certainly glad that all your bosses and customers are willing to bow down to your holy judgement about what features are to be allowed in the software that you are graciously designing for them. Indeed I am so inspired by your disdain of design documents, that, from now on, I am only going to design pong-clones, and tell them that that is what is specified by the seeecret design document that I keep in my head.
Mar
24
comment Why bother with detailed specs?
@nikie: Must be nice.
Mar
24
comment Why bother with detailed specs?
@nikie: Tell it to the Duke Nukem design team. You have to deal with QA, marketing, phbs who read too many magazines...It still matters.
Mar
18
comment Harmful temptations in programming
In my environment, there are two major sites. Either one can originate a request for code, but the code will end up being deployed to both. They're different enough that you have to tune the code a bit for each...The practical result is that one site always gets beta code, and the other site always gets polished code, but then we never have time to migrate the polish back to the other site. I have had a number of people complain about our "uneven" code, or alternately, people at one site complaining about a program that people at the other site think is perfect.
Mar
17
comment Are `break` and `continue` bad programming practices?
@sjoerd: What it does is tell whoever is reading the code that the break conditions aren't in the loop header. It's not ideal, but it's functionally identical to the original posters code.
Mar
16
comment How was programming done 20 years ago?
@slomojo: In 1991? You know the first NT windows came out in 1993, right? Netware was popular until NT 4 started gaining traction in the late 90's. Of course, proprietary Unix crushed both of them in terms of usage, but still.
Mar
15
comment How was programming done 20 years ago?
@Thorbjørn : We had the coffee pot cam! And usenet! What else do you really need? Honestly, from my recollections, it wasn't that much of a problem. The need for web documentation has increased with the complexity of the stuff you're creating. If you were hammering together an accounting application with a text gui, you didn't need much documentation.
Mar
15
comment How was programming done 20 years ago?
@tmn: Heh. I don't like those either, for pretty much the same reason...Of course, I don't need to use them either, not being a web guy. 4GLs were worse though, because they were proprietary. Support cost a fortune, and if you didn't have support, you couldn't upgrade. I looked into a new license for ours a few years back, so I could migrate everything to a new server environment, and the license ran 150k! Per site! The COBOL I could migrate for free, and the databases only required some $500 interface. Whole project shut down because of that goddamn proprietary 4GL environment.
Mar
15
comment How was programming done 20 years ago?
Goddamn 4gls. I used one (Speedware) YESTERDAY. Why anyone ever thought that was a good idea is beyond me, but all my predecessors put untold man-hours into coding unsupportable 4GL code, and every now and again, I have to tweak something in the system. Talk about a useless skill.
Mar
4
comment What do you do when you encounter an idiotic interview question?
@carson: The worst I ever experienced was with some consulting company in New York City...They told me that an efficiency expert had told them their productivity would go up 20% if everyone used their mouse with their left hand ONLY, and that, should I be lucky enough to be offered the job, I'd have to learn this "skill". Needless to say, I didn't stick around.
Mar
3
comment Stuff you should have learned in school but didn't pay attention to at the time
@mark: "Cognitive Science", which was my original major, is basically nothing but AI, and largely comprised of philosophy. There are two kinds of philosophy: analytic and continental. All the stupid shit is continental. Analytic is logic, cog. sci, linguistics and shit like that.
Feb
28
comment Is writing comments inside methods not a good practice?
I do a lot of financials programming, and as a result, a lot of my methods are just math equations. Every single one of those needs to be exhaustively commented.
Dec
28
comment Advice for good web server development setup
@tmn: Eclipse at least has PDT (eclipse.org/pdt) which does pretty well for php. I've never been all that happy with the web design tools, but, really that's not the programmers problem ;)