meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 2 years, 5 months |
| seen | Apr 2 at 21:48 | |
| stats | profile views | 75 |
|
Feb 25 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Feb 20 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Oct 7 |
awarded | Good Question |
|
Sep 30 |
comment |
Why do business analysts and project managers get higher salaries than programmers? More [perceived] responsibility = more money. |
|
Aug 27 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Apr 24 |
awarded | Quorum |
|
Apr 24 |
comment |
A software design pattern to model runtime-dependent behavior Note to self, being my usual anal self on SE does not bide well in a social environment and interviews where others warm to people easy to work with. |
|
Apr 24 |
comment |
What is the alternative to frequent manual verification? Then members are moderators. They are, together, controlling the status of questions. That's moderating :D |
|
Apr 24 |
revised |
What is the alternative to frequent manual verification? deleted 118 characters in body |
|
Apr 24 |
comment |
What is the alternative to frequent manual verification? Thanks. Question was closed as not constructive even though your answer helped me (and most probably others in a similar situation). Thanks for your time. |
|
Apr 24 |
accepted | What is the alternative to frequent manual verification? |
|
Apr 24 |
comment |
What is the alternative to frequent manual verification? CLOSE? Can somebody with a morsel of sympathy tell me why this is now being closed? This is a valid question, how is this not constructive? The answers are helping me become a better programmer, is that not the definition of constructive?? |
|
Apr 24 |
comment |
What is the alternative to frequent manual verification? The return as in return of anything..function, page, service.. |
|
Apr 24 |
revised |
What is the alternative to frequent manual verification? edited title |
|
Apr 24 |
comment |
What is the alternative to frequent manual verification? I'm not fishing for a mountain of answers, if that is what you mean. I want relevant, targeted answers from a few people who have been in this position. If they also have other such habits they found hard to shake, then I'd be interested to hear them, that is all. I'll rephrase the title.. |
|
Apr 24 |
asked | What is the alternative to frequent manual verification? |
|
Jan 4 |
comment |
Right Tools For The Job? One Location vs Multiple? @YannisRizos thanks. Don't know what else to say. Can you suggest a site where I can ask this question? |
|
Jan 4 |
comment |
Right Tools For The Job? One Location vs Multiple? @ChrisF: not asking for people's opinions. Asking for people's experiences. |
|
Jan 4 |
revised |
Right Tools For The Job? One Location vs Multiple? edited title |
|
Jan 4 |
comment |
Right Tools For The Job? One Location vs Multiple? Hi. My needs are as mentioned - bug tracking, user stories, git hosting, team collab, client feedback, storage. Thing is, I can do all this with codebasehq but it would seem there are far better tools for the job, not a one-size-fits-all piece of kit. |
